perfsonar development work

[Loukik Kudarimoti <>]

Roman Lapacz wrote:
> Some time ago I sent a question about naming of war files (it was 
> suggested to have a version number in the name but this way that 
> version will be present in URL address and my understanding was that 
> we didn't want it) to the release mailing list but I haven't got any 
> response yet :)
>
> Roman
Hi Roman,

I had sent an email with the filenames expected for all flavors. I 
remember your email asking for clarifications and I haven't answered it, 
my apologies for that.

As per the original email on the filenames below, war files actually 
contain version numbers. The recommended deployment of war files however is
- either via server.xml entry - the context does not contain version 
numbers. Hence, when services are upgraded, the access URL does not change.

- If dropping war file directly into webapps is preferred, we are 
thinking to suggest using sym links but this is not tested yet. The sym 
link file could be without a version number and could point to the war 
file which contains the version number. Again, this is not tested


About Stijn's original email, I think the problem is different. I think 
the web service doesn't come deployed (maybe build process does not 
modify the wsdd or something?) Since the webadmin is accessible, clearly 
its the web service not working (the deployment URL used by Stijn is 
perfect though).

Loukik

Previous email on filenames expected by release management:

Here are the files that we expect from you for your built product.

Conventions:

For RPMs
<name>-<version>-<release>.<arch>.rpm

For debian
<name>_<version>-<release>_<arch>.deb

For WAR files (similar to rpms)
<name>-<version>-<release>.<arch>.war


List of files expected

1. geant2_java-rrd-ma

* geant2-java-rrd-ma-3.0-1.i386.rpm
* geant2-java-rrd-ma-3.0-1.x86_64.rpm
* geant2-java-rrd-ma-3.0-1.sparc.rpm

* geant2-java-rrd-ma-3.0-1.i386.war
* geant2-java-rrd-ma-3.0-1.x86_64.war
* geant2-java-rrd-ma-3.0-1.sparc.war

* geant2-java-rrd-ma_3.0-1_i386.deb
* geant2-java-rrd-ma_3.0-1_ia64.deb
* geant2-java-rrd-ma_3.0-1_amd64.deb
* geant2-java-rrd-ma_3.0-1_sparc.deb


2. geant2_java-sql-ma

* geant2-java-sql-ma-2.0-1.noarch.rpm
* geant2-java-sql-ma-2.0-1.war
* geant2-java-sql-ma_2.0-1_all.deb


3. geant2_java-xml-ls

* geant2-java-xml-ls-1.2-1.noarch.rpm
* geant2-java-xml-ls-1.2-1.war
* geant2-java-xml-ls_1.2-1_all.deb


4. geant2_java-sshtelnet-mp

* geant2-java-sshtelnet-mp-1.2-1.noarch.rpm
* geant2-java-sshtelnet-mp-1.2.war
* geant2-java-sshtelnet-mp_1.2-1_all.deb


5. geant2_java-as
* geant2-java-as-1.0-1.noarch.rpm
* geant2-java-as-1.0-1.war
* geant2-java-as_1.0-1_all.deb

6. rnp_java-cl-mp

* rnp-java-cl-mp-2.0-1.noarch.rpm
* rnp-java-cl-mp-2.0-1.war
* rnp-java-cl-mp_2.0-1_all.deb


7. perl-perfSONAR-MP-BWCTL

* perl-perfSONAR-MP-BWCTL-0.4-1.noarch.rpm
* perl-perfSONAR-MP-BWCTL_0.4-1_all.deb






Roman Lapacz wrote:
> Stijn Melis wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > I am trying to create a WAR file for the SSH TELNET MP, but I am 
> > having some problems.
> >
> > Do I have to do anything special to get the MP to work, once I placed 
> > the WAR file in the tomcat/webapps dir and restarted tomcat? Because 
> > when I go to the MP's normal address:
> >
> > http://mdm-1.par.fr.geant2.net:8090/geant2_java-sshtelnet-mp/services/TelnetSSH 
> >
> >
> > I get a "AXIS error - No service is available at this URL".
> >
> > However, when I go to the webadmin pages at
> >
> > http://mdm-1.par.fr.geant2.net:8090/geant2_java-sshtelnet-mp
> >
> > this does work. The admin is operational as well, because I can 
> > upload my metadata configuration file to the eXist database (after I 
> > update the path to the configuration file, that is).
> >
> > Does anybody know what I have to add to the WAR file in order for 
> > this to work?
>
> This is normal behavior of WAR file. The address of your service is 
> different because war file is in tomcat/webapps directory (context is 
> not setup in tomcat config file.)
> I understand that the name of your WAR file is 
> geant2_java-sshtelnet-mp.war. Am I right?
>
> Some time ago I sent a question about naming of war files (it was 
> suggested to have a version number in the name but this way that 
> version will be present in URL address and my understanding was that 
> we didn't want it) to the release mailing list but I haven't got any 
> response yet :)
>
> Roman
>
>
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > Stijn