perfsonar-dev - Re: [pS-dev] [Security Update] New version of perfSONAR base
Subject: perfsonar development work
List archive
- From: Cándido Rodríguez Montes <>
- To: Ralf Kleineisel <>
- Cc: Nina Jeliazkova <>, Perfsonar Development <>
- Subject: Re: [pS-dev] [Security Update] New version of perfSONAR base
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 19:41:47 +0100
Hi Ralf, El 03/03/2008, a las 14:03, Ralf Kleineisel escribió:
Yes, that's true. They are in other scenarios and they don't need the timestamp.
Sorry but I disagree. In fact we're not securing perfSONAR, but we've building an authentication and authorization infrastructure in it and integrating into a multi-domain federation (called confederation by JRA5). And, for that purpose, we're using the available standards for securing web services, as perfSONAR is based on SOAP web services. The timestamp is also recommended in that standard for enforcing the security of security tokens, so I think we should use it.
-- Cándido Rodríguez Montes E-mail: Middleware warrior Tel:+34 955 05 66 13 Red.ES/RedIRIS Edificio CICA Avenida Reina Mercedes, s/n 41012 Sevilla SPAIN |
- Re: [pS-dev] [Security Update] New version of perfSONAR base, Cándido Rodríguez Montes, 03/03/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] [Security Update] New version of perfSONAR base, Ralf Kleineisel, 03/03/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] [Security Update] New version of perfSONAR base, Cándido Rodríguez Montes, 03/04/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] [Security Update] New version of perfSONAR base, Michael Bischoff, 03/05/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] [Security Update] New version of perfSONAR base, Cándido Rodríguez Montes, 03/04/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] [Security Update] New version of perfSONAR base, Joe Metzger, 03/03/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] [Security Update] New version of perfSONAR base, Cándido Rodríguez Montes, 03/04/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] [Security Update] New version of perfSONAR base, Ralf Kleineisel, 03/03/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.