Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-dev - Re: [pS-dev] [Security Update] New version of perfSONAR base

Subject: perfsonar development work

List archive

Re: [pS-dev] [Security Update] New version of perfSONAR base


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Cándido Rodríguez Montes <>
  • To: Ralf Kleineisel <>
  • Cc: Nina Jeliazkova <>, Perfsonar Development <>
  • Subject: Re: [pS-dev] [Security Update] New version of perfSONAR base
  • Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 19:41:47 +0100

Hi Ralf,

El 03/03/2008, a las 14:03, Ralf Kleineisel escribió:

Hi,

Cándido Rodríguez Montes wrote:

I've just uploaded a new version of perfsonar-base and
perfsonar-base-ac_authn (20080303) which does a workaround about the
timestamp.

I don't see the point of that timestamp function at all.

There are so many security sensitive applications like ssh, ssl and none of
them relies on the computer's clock.

Yes, that's true. They are in other scenarios and they don't need the timestamp.


If you need secure perfSONAR: Why don't you simply tunnel it through an ssl
tunnel? Why invent the wheel once again?

Sorry but I disagree. In fact we're not securing perfSONAR, but we've building an authentication and authorization infrastructure in it and integrating into a multi-domain federation (called confederation by JRA5). 
And, for that purpose, we're using the available standards for securing web services, as perfSONAR is based on SOAP web services. The timestamp is also recommended in that standard for enforcing the security of security tokens, so I think we should use it.

Regards


Best regards

Ralf


--
Cándido Rodríguez Montes E-mail: 
Middleware warrior Tel:+34 955 05 66 13
Red.ES/RedIRIS
Edificio CICA
Avenida Reina Mercedes, s/n
41012 Sevilla
SPAIN







Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page