perfsonar development work

[Michael Michalis <>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Roman Lapacz wrote:
| Michael Michalis wrote:
| Szymon Trocha wrote:
| | Jason Zurawski pisze:
| |> Michael;
| |>
| |>> LS Registration Testing
| |>> =================
| |>> The service failed to register to LS. After investigation it was
| |>> concluded that the reason for this was incompatibility between the
| |>> generated LSRegister requests of  the service and the LS 
implementation.
| |>
| |>
| |> I would be interested in seeing an example of the incorrect request
| |> messages that were being sent, and the responses that the LS was
| |> issuing.  This should benefit all service developers and get us to a
| |> solution much faster.
| |
| Hi,
|
| I've used tethereal to capture the traffic between RRD MA and LS.(I'm 
attaching it). The LSRegister Request is transported in three different 
HTTP requests. It seems that for some reason the checksum of the of tcp 
packages send from the RRD MA to the LS containing the LSRegisterRequest 
is wrong. Just a guess, as am not sure how the HTTP reconstructs the 
segmented request, but it could be that the LSRegister Request parts are 
not reconstructed properly  and thats the reason why LS registration 
works OK when we have small LSRegsister requests like the ones in the 
example (Interface_specification doc) and why the LS cannot parse bigger 
LSRegister requests like the ones sent by the RRD MA.
|
|
| > The problem with register request has been solved. Maciej mentioned 
this in his email. The problem was in LS' objects.config file. Some 
mappings there were missing. When Maciej updated that file sending 
register request (that one which didn't work in MA) started working fine.
|
:-( :-( :-[    . The funny thing is that I saw Maciejs mail that said 
what you have said Roman, but then I also saw Szymons mail that said to 
provide response and request and for some reason I started 
investigating. That was a nice way to start the morning....I think I 
need some vacations....Sorry for the spam guys.


Michalis
| > Roman
|
|
| Michalis
| | Michalis,
| |
| | Could you attach req/resp to bug #348?
| |
| | Regards,
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHvUlYoEWq51/Q/40RAnpCAKCEx3ABGMxOet7m0QeKDomxue0CuQCfetR/
rjOkHLU6B31AFBmba4OiUic=
=t4/G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----