perfsonar-dev - Re: SA6 monitoring
Subject: perfsonar development work
List archive
- From: Roman Lapacz <>
- To:
- Cc: Nicolas Simar <>, Guilherme Fernandes <>, Roman Lapacz <>, Maciej Glowiak <>, WiN-Labor <>, , "" <>, Yee-Ting Li <>
- Subject: Re: SA6 monitoring
- Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:18:11 +0100
Andras Kovacs wrote:
Hi Roman,Hi
The testing is only about to test the signalling, not the traffic. If there is packet loss inbetween, it is the task of PERT or NREN or/and GN2 NOCs to solve the problems.
Here, we would like to only check that the international infrastructure allowing countries to peer works or not.
I see your point but it could be very useful for troubleshooting to monitor both levels: 1) signaling and 2) network transmission (even using simple ping) in the same infrastructure. Doing regular test you would have quite complete view (signalling information and base traffic statistics).
First we need to investigate and write down the names of metrics to be monitored. I think in this kind of monitoring important are delay (owd), jitter and packet drops (of course there might be more).In the very first version (until the end of GN2 project), we only plan to measure up/down, it is enough to cover our needs.
I guess that Andras wants to focus on passive monitoring (monitoring the traffic during VC transmission). A test tool like BWCTL could be used as well but test traffic should have characteristics similar to real VC transmissions.This is not, right, see the aboves.
Is there an example to see this application? We would like to use geographical representation for other purposes, we might want to integrate monitoring into this.c) How will they access the information? (what visualisation tool, you hinted one below) How will it be the data represented to them?
You mention a clickable weathermap. Can you provide a little bit more information about this.
(please see a status page: http://perfsonar.acad.bg/status/ and how we might be building another similar page for the network services at a later stage: http://wiki.geant2.net/bin/view/SA3/SaThreeAppNrenStatusPage)
The application made by Yee could be also considered (it's based on Google maps). It looks really nice and I remember it had very (!) positive opinions during last I2 conference.
Knowing more about your plans I don't think this app is for you. Maybe Yee or Nicolas could say more.
Roman
- Re: SA6 monitoring, Roman Lapacz, 01/02/2008
- Re: SA6 monitoring, Andras Kovacs, 01/04/2008
- Re: SA6 monitoring, Roman Lapacz, 01/04/2008
- Re: SA6 monitoring, Andras Kovacs, 01/04/2008
- Re: SA6 monitoring, Yee-Ting Li, 01/07/2008
- Re: SA6 monitoring, Roman Lapacz, 01/04/2008
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: SA6 monitoring, Andras Kovacs, 01/04/2008
- Re: SA6 monitoring, Nicolas Simar, 01/10/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: SA6 monitoring, Fausto Vetter, 01/11/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: SA6 monitoring, murilo, 01/12/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: SA6 monitoring, murilo, 01/12/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: SA6 monitoring, Andras Kovacs, 01/14/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: SA6 monitoring, murilo, 01/12/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: SA6 monitoring, Andras Kovacs, 01/14/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: SA6 monitoring, murilo, 01/12/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: SA6 monitoring, Fausto Vetter, 01/11/2008
- Re: SA6 monitoring, Nicolas Simar, 01/15/2008
- Re: SA6 monitoring, Nicolas Simar, 01/10/2008
- Re: SA6 monitoring, Andras Kovacs, 01/04/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.