perfsonar development work

Hi Candido,

it is not a documentation issue only, but the problem is that the
perfSONAR base is designed for pure perfSONAR services. The cNIS
implementation has been started independent from perfSONAR and now there
is the need to add the perfSONAR interface on top.

Best regards
Andreas

> Hi Andreas,
>
> El 25/09/2007, a las 14:38, 
> 
>  escribió:
>
>> Dear colleagues,
>>
>> During the cNISv1 meeting which currently takes place we are
>> discussing
>> the fulfillment of requirements for perfSONAR. For the PSNC developers
>> (CNIS group) there is the problem that the file psBase.jar is quite
>> large
>> and that it takes some effort to identify what they need. This
>> relates to
>> implementing the registration with the LS and also to the Echo
>> request/response. Anand's opinion is (and I agree) that it would be
>> nice
>> if the psBase.jar would be split up into more clearly understandable
>> parts. Such a split-up would also be useful for other users, I
>> guess. My
>> plea is that we should increase the priority of this point.
>
> I'm not sure if I understand your problem, but it seems a problem of
> documentation. There is a set of classes in the perfSONAR base and
> you don't know which java classes you have to use for implementing
> the registration with the LS and the Echo request/response. So, IMHO
> the solution is not splitting up the psBase.jar.
>
> Regards
>
>>
>> Best regards
>> Andreas
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Cándido Rodríguez Montes              E-mail: 
> 
> Red.ES/RedIRIS                                        Tel:+34 955 05 66 13
> Edificio CICA
> Avenida Reina Mercedes, s/n
> 41012 Sevilla
> SPAIN
>
>
>
>