perfsonar development work

["Eric L. Boyd" <>]

Gang,

So, I agree one key topic is to review the LHC commitment (which means 
participation by all the developers building things we promised LHC). As 
important is to lay out a roadmap for the next 12 months for LHC support 
going forward.

A second topic is to review development and deployment plans for 
individual networks.

Others?

--Eric

Mark Yampolskiy wrote:
> Hi Nicolas, all,
>
> is participation of M&M by this meeting expected?
>
> From our point of view, it is crucial that the tools effectively 
> support the needs of operations. Thus, the interoperability between 
> and integration of tools for LHCOPN operations is a very critical 
> issue. Furthermore all these tools should be treated as a bundle and 
> discussion about possible new futures should take it into account and 
> target needs of operations and of end-users (LHC).
>
> Cheers,
> M&M
>
> Nicolas Simar schrieb:
> > It is in a month time. We need to identify who needs to go there this 
> > week as the flight prices increases, otherwise, we will have to 
> > cancel the meeting.
> >
> > Nicolas
> >
> > Szymon Trocha wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I would like to start collecting items for the next meeting in Berkeley
> > > http://wiki.perfsonar.net/jra1-wiki/index.php/Berkeley_Dev_Sep_11_2007
> > >
> > > The initial idea is that it will coordinate efforts to build and 
> > > deploy measurement tools for the LHC. I think based on the scope of 
> > > discussion and topics we will identify the people who should attend 
> > > the meeting.
> > >
> > > So please send me your proposals of specific topics and problems to 
> > > discuss.
> > >
> > > Regards,

--
Eric Boyd, Deputy Technology Officer
Internet2

office: +1-734-352-7032

The best relationships are built on trust:
We have a lot InCommon.
http://www.incommonfederation.org