perfsonar-dev - Re: [pS-dev] GPS
Subject: perfsonar development work
List archive
- From: Sven Ubik <>
- To: Verena Venus <>
- Cc: Nicolas Simar <>, "" <>
- Subject: Re: [pS-dev] GPS
- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 08:13:42 +0200 (CEST)
Hi,
the question that is typically asked is
1) why do we need OWD?
.... instead of ping? The answer to this question would probably be: If you
have an asymmetric path where one direction is significantly slower (or
faster ;) ) than the other direction, you cannot see this with ping, because
ping measures only the round trip time.
You need to measure both directions seperately to find out such behaviour.
I think this describes what OWD measurement does, but not why we NEED it. In my opinion importance of OWD is sometimes overstated, RTT is usually enough to assess effect of delay on throughput. It is rather hard to find an application that would really benefit from OWD instead of RTT. I think that one use of OWD (or detection of assymetry in delay) could be in assessing whether router queues fill up, which a sort of TCP implementations starting from Vegas unsuccessfully tried to do using RTT.
Regards,
Sven
- Re: [pS-dev] GPS, Sven Ubik, 08/01/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] GPS, Jeff W. Boote, 08/21/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] GPS, Joe Metzger, 08/21/2007
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [pS-dev] GPS, Jochen Reinwand, 08/01/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] GPS, Jeff W. Boote, 08/21/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.