perfsonar development work

[Roman Lapacz <>]

Maciej Glowiak wrote:
> >
> > I don't really see the reason to put another parameters container 
> in. Or
> > any reason to use a list of parameters inside this either.
>
> Well, current implementation of NMWG classes doesn't support that.
> The second thing, the structure I gave was already agreed. That was my 
> understanding. It's difficult for me to send you what actually was 
> agreed and when, because as I told before, I lost all my e-mail 
> history. I was given the example of parameters in parameters from 
> Roman, so maybe he could disclaim what actually was the decision.
Maciej,

I gave you what was agreed during the Brasil meeting. See the minutes 
and my discussion with Jason and Jeff on the mailing list after that 
meeting.

Roman

> For me your example is good as well, but I am not sure whether 
> eventType is allowed inside parameter now.
>
> I hope I clarified the vision.
>
> Maciej