Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-dev - Re: [pS-dev] Proposal of change in Lookup Info structure

Subject: perfsonar development work

List archive

Re: [pS-dev] Proposal of change in Lookup Info structure


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Jeff W. Boote" <>
  • To: Maciej Glowiak <>
  • Cc: Perfsonar Development <>, Jason Zurawski <>, Martin Swany <>, Roman Lapacz <>, Szymon Trocha <>
  • Subject: Re: [pS-dev] Proposal of change in Lookup Info structure
  • Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 16:01:21 -0600

Maciej Glowiak wrote:
Sorry, small mistake (in supportedEventTypes), it should be:

--------------------------------------------------------------
<nmwg:metadata id="lookup-info">
<nmwg:parameters id="lookup-info">

<nmwg:parameter name="serviceName" value="Java RRD MA" />
<nmwg:parameter name="accessPoint" value="http://shower.fr:8080"; />
<nmwg:parameter name="serviceType" value="MA" />
<nmwg:parameter name="serviceDescription"
value="Java RRD MA, perfSONAR project, 229.148.249.60" />

<nmwg:parameter name="supportedEventTypes">
<nmwg:parameters id="eventTypes">
<nmwg:parameter name="eventType1"
value="http://.../utilization/"; />
<nmwg:parameter name="eventType2"
value="http://.../l2-path-status/"; />
</nmwg:parameters>
</nmwg:parameter>

</nmwg:metadata>
--------------------------------------------------------------

But anyway, the question was about general idea of such change.

I already gave my opinion of the general change. But, I'm curious about the specifics here as well.

Why not just use:

<nmwg:parameter name="supportedEventTypes">
<nmwg:eventType>eventType1</nmwg:eventType>
<nmwg:eventType>eventType2</nmwg:eventType>
<nmwg:eventType>eventType3</nmwg:eventType>
<nmwg:eventType>eventType4</nmwg:eventType>
<nmwg:eventType>eventType5</nmwg:eventType>
</nmwg:parameter>

I don't really see the reason to put another parameters container in. Or any reason to use a list of parameters inside this either.

jeff



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page