perfsonar development work

["Jeff W. Boote" <>]

Roman Lapacz wrote:
> I see your point (you a right to change the namespace). I think we can 
> accept both approaches (at least for now as we don't have any experience 
> using them). The second one seems to be simpler (and probably faster if 
> you don't have to use xpath engine). The first one is more general. Are 
> you OK to support both?

Absolutely. In fact, I think the more simple one is certainly the first one 
to do.

I was just trying to figure out what would be needed to create a generic 
transformation service in support of something like this. But, there is no 
reason to do the more complex case first. (I just wanted to make sure the 
abstraction worked, I think it does.)

jeff