perfsonar development work

[Jason Zurawski <>]

All;

> > the idea to use time seams to be the right one.
> > However (hehe, how aren't there always some "however"s ;-)) from the 
> > discussion in the mailing list it is not really clear whether schema 
> > specification is already agreed and changed. Matthias and me have 
> > agreed not to make any changes in our SW which support 
> > undocumented/undefined/not-agreed futures of NMWG schema (ask Loukik, 
> > he will tell you how bullheaded we are in this respect ;-))
>
> I checked the schema
>
> http://anonsvn.internet2.edu/svn/nmwg/trunk/nmwg/schema/rnc/nmbase.rnc
>
> and I see that using time inside parameter is fine. Jason, could you 
> confirm?
There is not a strict check on the type of children that may exist 
inside of a parameter, therefore any sort of element may be enclosed.

-jason