perfsonar development work

[Fausto Vetter <>]

Ok,

I will try to prepare something to perfSonar Dev's meeting so.

Fausto

Jeff W. Boote wrote:

> Szymon Trocha wrote:
>
> > Andreas Hanemann wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Fausto,
> > >
> > > As you know I have filled out the other sheet for the client research,
> > > but this survey are really too many questions. There are 34 excel 
> > > sheets
> > > with more than 20 questions each. Even if they may not apply (for
> > > knowing this you have to get somehow familiar with COBIT), you have 
> > > read
> > > them.
> > >
> > > Since this may also be the situation for other people involved in the
> > > perfSONAR development, you should maybe take a different approach and
> > > propose this as an action point for the Salvador meeting. You could at
> > > give a presentation about COBIT (I guess that most of the developers 
> > > are
> > > not familiar with it) and how it can be applied in the perfSONAR
> > > development at first. You may then distribute some sheets for filling
> > > them out there so that you are sure that you have at least a set of
> > > completed sheets. This could ensure you a more reliable basis for
> > > interpreting the survey results. However, this survey should also be
> > > limited towards a compact set of questions.
> >
> >
> > Hi Fausto,
> >
> > I think I'd agree with Andreas. Last week I approached the 
> > questionnaire but I failed. I don't know COBIT so this can be a 
> > reason but I also don't understand the questions in many points. Many 
> > of them look identical and I don't know why :)
>
>
> I agree. I tried and failed as well. I didn't really understand the 
> questions. And it was far, far too long. I could not spend that much 
> time on it.
>
> jeff