perfsonar development work

[Roman Lapacz <>]

Hi,

what do you think to move objects.config file to ggf repository? Now it 
is in perfsonar and when I use certain revision number of ggf in STABLE 
branch or RCx tag in SVN then the file might not be in sync with ggf.

Roman




-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        Re: error in catalina.out
Date:   Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:10:13 +0200
From:   Roman Lapacz 
<>
To:     Loukik Kudarimoti 
<>
References:     
<>



Loukik Kudarimoti wrote:
> this does not impact RRD MA. I think its because objects.config file 
> has been updated but the specified classes are missing?

The problem is that ggf external repository and it's classes are 
described by objects.config which is outside of this repository (it 
exists in perfsonar repository). This way ggf and objects.config may not 
be in sync in some situations. This is the situation we have now. I can 
do this:

- change the revision version (number) of ggf in RRD STABLE to 215
- change the revision version (number) of objects.config in RRD STABLE 
to have it describing ggf before the change causing problems.

Roman



> Loukik.
>
> Error reading line 
> [http://ggf.org/ns/nmwg/topology/base/3.0/long/      
> org.ggf.ns.nmwg.topology.base.v3_0.Long] from config file
> Error reading line 
> [http://ggf.org/ns/nmwg/topology/base/3.0/lat/       
> org.ggf.ns.nmwg.topology.base.v3_0.Lat] from config file
> LSRegisterRequestGenerator: process data 1
> Error reading line 
> [http://ggf.org/ns/nmwg/topology/base/3.0/long/      
> org.ggf.ns.nmwg.topology.base.v3_0.Long] from config file
> Error reading line 
> [http://ggf.org/ns/nmwg/topology/base/3.0/lat/       
> org.ggf.ns.nmwg.topology.base.v3_0.Lat] from config file
> Error reading line 
> [http://ggf.org/ns/nmwg/topology/base/3.0/long/      
> org.ggf.ns.nmwg.topology.base.v3_0.Long] from config file
> Error reading line 
> [http://ggf.org/ns/nmwg/topology/base/3.0/lat/       
> org.ggf.ns.nmwg.topology.base.v3_0.Lat] from config file