perfsonar-dev - Re: [pS-dev] perfsonar: r2252 (UKNOWN datum items)
Subject: perfsonar development work
List archive
- From: Roman Lapacz <>
- To: "Jeff W. Boote" <>
- Cc: , Loukik Kudarimoti <>
- Subject: Re: [pS-dev] perfsonar: r2252 (UKNOWN datum items)
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:50:35 +0100
Jeff W. Boote wrote:
wrote:
If there is no data in the database the response will have only one datum element with 'UNKNOWN' values.
example:
<nmwg:data id="7f89" metadataIdRef="md-link-PSNC-2-DFN-MUE-004">
<ifevt:datum xmlns:ifevt="http://ggf.org/ns/nmwg/event/status/base/2.0/">
<ifevt:stateAdmin>UNKNOWN</ifevt:stateAdmin>
<ifevt:stateOper>UNKNOWN</ifevt:stateOper>
</ifevt:datum>
</nmwg:data>
Roman - anyone else that was part of the decision to add this...
Why is this better than no datum at all?
My concern with adding this, is that it is different from the behavior of other services now. The RRD-MA for example, returns no datum if you ask for data outside of the time-range of data it holds.
We want a generic visualization client to have only a very small amount of work to add in each new data type. Therefore, we should have as similar access semantics as possible for all MA's.
If there is a good reason for it in this service, then it begs the question: Should other services be creating the equivalent of a 'missing-values' datum in the case of an empty result?
Hi Jeff,
I had similar concerns :) but I was asked by Loukik to do it (before the change there was no datum in the response). If I understood correctly, the visualization application made by JRA4 guys requires this approach. I'm sure Loukik can say more.
Roman
- perfsonar: r2252 - trunk/perfsonar/src/org/perfsonar/service/measurementArchive/sqlType/fetch, svnlog, 03/19/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfsonar: r2252 (UKNOWN datum items), Jeff W. Boote, 03/19/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfsonar: r2252 (UKNOWN datum items), Roman Lapacz, 03/19/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfsonar: r2252 (UKNOWN datum items), Loukik Kudarimoti, 03/19/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfsonar: r2252 (UKNOWN datum items), Jeff W. Boote, 03/19/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfsonar: r2252 (UKNOWN datum items), Loukik Kudarimoti, 03/19/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfsonar: r2252 (UKNOWN datum items), Szymon Trocha, 03/23/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfsonar: r2252 (UKNOWN datum items), Jeff W. Boote, 03/23/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfsonar: r2252 (UKNOWN datum items), Szymon Trocha, 03/23/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfsonar: r2252 (UKNOWN datum items), Roman Lapacz, 03/23/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfsonar: r2252 (UKNOWN datum items), Jeff W. Boote, 03/23/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfsonar: r2252 (UKNOWN datum items), Roman Lapacz, 03/23/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfsonar: r2252 (UKNOWN datum items), Szymon Trocha, 03/23/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfsonar: r2252 (UKNOWN datum items), Loukik Kudarimoti, 03/19/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfsonar: r2252 (UKNOWN datum items), Jeff W. Boote, 03/19/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfsonar: r2252 (UKNOWN datum items), Loukik Kudarimoti, 03/19/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfsonar: r2252 (UKNOWN datum items), Roman Lapacz, 03/19/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfsonar: r2252 (UKNOWN datum items), Matthias K. Hamm, 03/24/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfsonar: r2252 (UKNOWN datum items), Jeff W. Boote, 03/19/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.