perfsonar-dev - Re: Res: [pS-dev] Re: LS questions
Subject: perfsonar development work
List archive
- From: Maciej Glowiak <>
- To: Herbert Souza <>
- Cc: , , Jeff Boote <>, Perfsonar Development List <>
- Subject: Re: Res: [pS-dev] Re: LS questions
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:57:39 +0100
- Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAQMAAABtzGvEAAAABlBMVEUAAAD///+l2Z/dAAAA CXBIWXMAAEU1AABFNQF8gVf5AAAAB3RJTUUH1QYQDjo6uEWvwgAAAM5JREFUGNNN0LFqAkEUheGj KRZsfATrvENgYyH4APabxwgWGUUQC99BsNDCInUq7VImbbDZ0kayxBXMuN7jvTuKVh//mZlmQKZ1 EhQ8GAVgZECspEBdWQHRjR70KlgFKkoUaCw3ijSYQ4n5HfBK4a4jDcdDQPol/80Sr9BxZOOL4Fmr Jq8VBx7eopaSPvWGOm67fqol3j1q0XNs7Nk2cs6MU6gPNzf+ZGKQX4Ek8H6rAnFZnXB2vJxJcv8g C2P+WzL4tD+Txc4KydrIkh+eAdo01QbjQ84vAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC
- Organization: Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center
Herbert Souza wrote:
Thanks Maciej and Andreas,
I think that the LS could accept other Query Request Messages
(messages with symbolic
queries).
This should remove the proxy from the scene, therefore I think that the
communication customer -> proxy -> LS can cause loss of performance.
Thus the LS could receive query messages with xQuery
and symbolic queries, and doesn’t limit the functionality of the LS. Is it
possible?
Hi,
In my opinion that's not a good thing, because:
1) perfSONAR services are "simple" cooperating services.
2) LS is XQuery based because XML DB is used
I am against combining many protocols and functionalities in one super-service unless it's modular and there is a specific need for that.
We have discussed it several times and always the conclusion was the same.
In "proxy" solution if one wants to add new "query" mapping he just do it without modifying LS which is probably operational service. It's more flexible. I don't think the loss of performance is significant.
Best regards
Maciej
- Res: [pS-dev] Re: LS questions, Herbert Souza, 02/25/2007
- Re: Res: [pS-dev] Re: LS questions, Maciej Glowiak, 02/26/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.