perfsonar development work

["Jeff W. Boote" <>]

Loukik Kudarimoti wrote:
> > http://schemas.perfsonar.net/tools/admin/echo/ls/2.0
> >
> > http://schemas.perfsonar.net/tools/admin/echo/2.0 can be a generic 
> > version that any service can use, and can be extended by ones at lower 
> > levels.
> Just to make sure that everyone's on the right page on this, from 
> Roman's email, I understand that the implementation is
> http://www.perfsonar.net/tools/admin/echo/2.0  (no schemas in the 
> perfsonar url)
>
> While I am OK to have it the way it has been implemented currently, I do 
> feel that having the schemas in the dns name (like what was proposed by 
> Jeff) makes it much clearer that its a schema namespace and also ensures 
> our conformance with the OGF specification. (we are the the start of 
> doing this implementation, so lets do it thorough)

I agree. If schemas is not part of the dns name, then I would want 'ns' or 
something similar in the path portion above tools to indicate this is in schema 
namespace.

Roman, Maciej, can you change the 'www' to 'schemas' in the implementation 
please?

Thanks,
jeff