perfsonar development work

[Nicolas Simar <>]

Loukik Kudarimoti wrote:
> Roman Lapacz wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > during the meeting in Cambridge we discussed rules of giving version 
> > numbers to the release. I remember that according those rules we found 
> > out that the release which is being done should have number 2.0. Is it 
> > accepted? Do we have final decision what version number are we going 
> > to use: 1.1 or 2.0?
>
> umm...thanks for bringing this up Roman. (I would have liked to use the 
> minutes of the meeting as reference so that people who weren't at the 
> meeting could understand what we are talking about. However, the minutes 
> are not expected to be ready until end of January I think)
>
> I would like to us to call the upcoming release as 2.0 - this makes 
> sense as there are (backwards incompatible) schema changes in RRD MA 
> service and hence the bundle release qualifies as a major release (major 
> change from the client point of view). However, my main concern is that 
> calling it 1.1 to 2.0 might cause some confusion. Any other thoughts? I 
> am copying Eric and Nicolas to get their attention to this topic.

This point is a release management decision. You have defined clear 
criteria "backwards incompatible) schema changes" in this case for RRD 
MA service. So going to 2.0 is justified and necessary.

Cheers,
Nicolas

> Loukik.
>
> ps: Maybe we should discuss this more on thursday's release management 
> conf. call?
>
> > Roman

--
Nicolas
______________________________________________________________________

Nicolas Simar
Network Engineer

DANTE - www.dante.net

Tel - BE: +32 (0) 4 366 93 49
Tel - UK: +44 (0)1223 371 300
Mobile: +44 (0) 7740 176 883

City House, 126-130 Hills Road
Cambridge CB2 1PQ
UK
_____________________________________________________________________