perfsonar development work

[Loukik Kudarimoti <>]

Roman Lapacz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> during the meeting in Cambridge we discussed rules of giving version 
> numbers to the release. I remember that according those rules we found 
> out that the release which is being done should have number 2.0. Is it 
> accepted? Do we have final decision what version number are we going 
> to use: 1.1 or 2.0?
umm...thanks for bringing this up Roman. (I would have liked to use the 
minutes of the meeting as reference so that people who weren't at the 
meeting could understand what we are talking about. However, the minutes 
are not expected to be ready until end of January I think)

I would like to us to call the upcoming release as 2.0 - this makes 
sense as there are (backwards incompatible) schema changes in RRD MA 
service and hence the bundle release qualifies as a major release (major 
change from the client point of view). However, my main concern is that 
calling it 1.1 to 2.0 might cause some confusion. Any other thoughts? I 
am copying Eric and Nicolas to get their attention to this topic.

Loukik.

ps: Maybe we should discuss this more on thursday's release management 
conf. call?

> Roman