perfsonar development work

[Roman Lapacz <>]

Hi,

what's the outcome of yesterday's session on the release (dates? one 
release package/suite/budle? individual service releases? which services 
and functionalities?)

Roman



Loukik Kudarimoti wrote:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Release Proposal
> From:
> "Eric L. Boyd" 
> <>
> Date:
> Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:52:27 -0400
> To:
> Loukik Kudarimoti 
> <>
>
> To:
> Loukik Kudarimoti 
> <>
>
>
> ¢*1) We do a release in January (release management begins in December:
> **
> **  a) MUST include multi-LS
> **      -- MAY be subject to complete functional testing
> **      -- MUST be subject to some ad hoc testing through deployments
> **   b) MUST include RRD MA
> **      -- MUST be subject to complete functional testing
> **      -- MUST be subject to some ad hoc testing through deployments
> **   c) MAY include SQL MA
> **      -- if so MUST be subject to complete functional testing
> **      -- if so MUST include documentation on how to record/retrieve 
> specific data types **(e.g. BWCTL)
> **   d) MAY include Alcatel MP
> **      -- if so MUST be subject to complete functional testing
> **   e) MAY include CLI MP
> **      -- if so MUST be subject to complete functional testing
> **   f) MAY include BWCTL MP
> **      -- if so MUST be subject to complete functional testing
> **
> **   where "MUST" delays the release, but "MAY" does not.
> **
> **The release is led by Loukik with to-be-named support.
> ** *
> ¢*2) Individual services MAY release individually as decided by the 
> lead developer. They **MAY follow the standard release process. *