perfsonar-dev - Re: [pS-dev] LSRegistrationComponent
Subject: perfsonar development work
List archive
- From: Maciej Glowiak <>
- To: Guilherme Fernandes <>
- Cc: perfsonar-dev <>
- Subject: Re: [pS-dev] LSRegistrationComponent
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:24:24 +0200
- Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAQMAAABtzGvEAAAABlBMVEUAAAD///+l2Z/dAAAA CXBIWXMAAEU1AABFNQF8gVf5AAAAB3RJTUUH1QYQDjo6uEWvwgAAAM5JREFUGNNN0LFqAkEUheGj KRZsfATrvENgYyH4APabxwgWGUUQC99BsNDCInUq7VImbbDZ0kayxBXMuN7jvTuKVh//mZlmQKZ1 EhQ8GAVgZECspEBdWQHRjR70KlgFKkoUaCw3ijSYQ4n5HfBK4a4jDcdDQPol/80Sr9BxZOOL4Fmr Jq8VBx7eopaSPvWGOm67fqol3j1q0XNs7Nk2cs6MU6gPNzf+ZGKQX4Ek8H6rAnFZnXB2vJxJcv8g C2P+WzL4tD+Txc4KydrIkh+eAdo01QbjQ84vAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC
- Organization: Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center
Guilherme Fernandes wrote:
Hi all,
Maybe this should be addressed specifically to Roman, but I'm sending it to the list anyways. Shouldn't the LSRegistrationComponent that is currently under services/measurementArchive be made generic (changes to the properties names and external package)?. I've adapted it to reflect 'mp' properties instead of 'ma', but, since they're exactly the same (apart from the properties names), this doesn't seem the right way to go (it does work, of course).
Hi Guilherme,
You're right, the code is quite general and could be moved into generic. In fact the only problem is class name and properties names, which should be changed.
I think it'll be done in not so long time. ;-)
Maciej
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
| Maciej Glowiak Network Research and Development ||
|
Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center ||
| (+48 61) 858 2024 http://monstera.man.poznan.pl/ ||
====================================================================
- LSRegistrationComponent, Guilherme Fernandes, 09/20/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] LSRegistrationComponent, Maciej Glowiak, 09/20/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.