perfsonar development work

[Maciej Glowiak <>]

ulisses wrote:
> Hi Maciej!
>
> thanks for your answer, it has been very complete. But what I was thinking about 
> is that the client that registers the data, I believe it is not informed about the
> timeout in which the data is cleaned, that is: in the response no information 
> on
> when will the data expire is inserted.

Hi!

Yes, that's right. We haven't thought about it yet.

[ I CC-ed the e-mail to Vedrin. ]

Vedrin, what do you think: what would be the best way (from client point 
of view) for determining such LS parameters as TTL:

1. To return them as parameters inside the result code (but it would 
require an action to the service because it would be in the registration 
response) and would be hard to control if we had more than one parameter

2. Management/Information interface for the Service. It'd need probably 
new message types and much more implementation in services (it should be 
generic feature for all services)

I thing 2nd option would be the best solution but it'd need an agreement 
from the perfSONAR community.

Maciej


--

 --------------------------------------------------------------------
| Maciej Glowiak        Network Research and Development            ||
| 

     Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center ||
| (+48 61) 858 2024     http://monstera.man.poznan.pl/              ||
 ====================================================================