perfsonar development work

[Jason Zurawski <>]

Thursday at 16 CEST is fine for me.

-jason

ulisses wrote:
> On 2006-09-06 09:10:17, Jason Zurawski wrote:
>   
> > Ulisses;
> >
> > Martin and I both have another meeting at 17 CEST on Friday, so if that 
> > is selected we will need to be done by that time.
> >     
>
> what about your availability tomorrow?
>
>         Ulisses
>
>   
> > -jason
> >
> >
> >     
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > I have talked with martin and he proposes friday:
> > >
> > > (15:02:05) despista000: hi
> > > (15:02:11) despista000: can you propose another time?
> > > (15:02:19) despista000: (for the conf i mean)
> > >
> > > (15:03:00) martinswany: Hi Ulisses, I could do that time on Friday.
> > > (15:03:10) martinswany: I have a meeting right now, so I'm going away.
> > > (15:03:12) martinswany: be back soon
> > >
> > > can Jeff/Jason be tomorrow (thursday) at 16 CEST?
> > >
> > >         Ulisses
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2006-09-06 08:50:00, Martin Swany wrote:
> > >  
> > >       
> > > > HI Ulisses,
> > > >
> > > >    
> > > >         
> > > > > Nicolas suggested me to propose another conf call at 16:00 CEST  
> > > > > (UTC +2),
> > > > > for me is ok any day of the week even friday is less desiderable  
> > > > > but possible.
> > > > >
> > > > > because of the time shift, I think it is not possible to propose  
> > > > > today but
> > > > > tomorrow thursday instead.
> > > > >      
> > > > >           
> > > > I have a conflict at 10 EDT both today and tomorrow.
> > > >
> > > > martin
> > > >
> > > >    
> > > >