perfsonar-dev - Re: [pS-dev] [Fwd: Re: [I2G2-Proto] [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech]
Subject: perfsonar development work
List archive
- From: Roman Lapacz <>
- To: "Jeff W. Boote" <>
- Cc: Loukik Kudarimoti <>,
- Subject: Re: [pS-dev] [Fwd: Re: [I2G2-Proto] [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech]
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:36:27 +0200
Jeff W. Boote wrote:
Actually, we should not even have installation scripts. Some post-installation configuration scripts are reasonable. But, we should use the package management solutions that are out there. And, if the configuration scripts are post-installation it is easy to use tools like ant because we will know they are already installed.
Roman's scripts do make it much easier to collect the 'jar' dependencies. I think they are pretty good at that. I don't think this is a complete solution.
It's not of course. This solution has been introduced to remove the mess in lib directory and should be used by developers. It should not be used in the pS releases.
Roman
- [Fwd: Re: [I2G2-Proto] [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech], Jeff W. Boote, 08/18/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] [Fwd: Re: [I2G2-Proto] [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech], Loukik Kudarimoti, 08/18/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] [Fwd: Re: [I2G2-Proto] [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech], Jeff W. Boote, 08/18/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] [Fwd: Re: [I2G2-Proto] [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech], Roman Lapacz, 08/21/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] [Fwd: Re: [I2G2-Proto] [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech], Jeff W. Boote, 08/18/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] [Fwd: Re: [I2G2-Proto] [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech], Loukik Kudarimoti, 08/18/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.