Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-dev - Re: gatech experiences - internal discussion

Subject: perfsonar development work

List archive

Re: gatech experiences - internal discussion


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Roman Lapacz <>
  • To: Loukik Kudarimoti <>
  • Cc: Jason Zurawski <>, Nicolas Simar <>, , "Jeff W. Boote" <>
  • Subject: Re: gatech experiences - internal discussion
  • Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:00:38 +0200

Loukik Kudarimoti wrote:
Nicolas previously mentioned that we should try to achieve a balance in the emails that we send to perfsonar-user as the users won't have enough time to read them. I agree. I think this thread is too detailed. Hence I am moving it to perfsonar-dev.


Jason Zurawski wrote:

1) ./perfSONAR pre-install

This will ask if the user already has ant, tomcat, axis and exist.
* If the user says 'yes' to any of them, it will ask the path where it is located.
* If the user says 'no' to any of them, it will ask if the user wants to install them manually or download them automatically and install it.
** If the user chooses 'Manually', the script will ask the user to run the same script again after installing the dependency. It will also suggest download sites where the user can find the software for downloading
** If the user chooses 'Automatically' the script will know a list of sites where the software is available and it will download the software and install it.

The script will also prompt the user for the port number to run tomcat on. eXist can run on tomcat itself and hence on the same port as tomcat.



I am for the creation of some sort of repository (apt/yum) that we maintain and contains our pre-installation software (preferably packaged by someone else such as the individual linux vendors or the original authors).
I would prefer to use URLs for applications such as exist and tomcat. But I do not have a strong inclination towards it. Is there a reason why you would want to keep a copy of these applications on ps servers?

I don't however think that having the pS installer itself install the software is in our best interest. The installer then requires administrator priv. to access system folders to install items like java or tomcat (as well as configure iptables or other firewall software) where now it can be installed by an end user albeit needing one or two manual system level tweaks.

I am not suggesting to install java manually. The list says tomcat, axis, ant and exist. About tomcat, why is access to system folders required?
If the user wants us to install it automatically, we install it in the user's folder.

JRE could be installed this way as well


Roman




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page