Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ntacpeering - Re: Perverse Routing

Subject: NTAC Peering Working Group

List archive

Re: Perverse Routing


Chronological Thread 
    < Chronological >      < Thread >
  • From: David Farmer <>
  • To: NTAC <>, ,
  • Subject: Re: Perverse Routing
  • Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2019 15:39:55 -0600
By the way, I just realized I didn't do the same analysis for IPv6, so I just did it, and there is not a single perverse route in the IPv6 R&E route table. 

Unfortunately, I'm not sure if this is a good thing or simply a commentary on the sad state of IPv6 implementation and usage in our community. 
Basically the question is, are we doing a better job with IPv6? Or, have we not even implemented enough IPv6 to even make mistakes yet? 🤔

Thanks

On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 11:51 AM David Farmer <> wrote:
I'm sorry for cross-posting and for naming and shaming, but I think this needs some attention.

These I2 R&E routes all have major commercial transit providers in their AS Paths, a couple even more than one, and one is recirculating an ESNet route via a comercial ISP.
*> 42.83.130.0/24     146.57.255.241        2735    202      0 11537 22388 7660 7497 4635 6939 24785 8763 8763 8763 8763 24151 i
*> 42.83.132.0/24     146.57.255.241        2735    202      0 11537 22388 7660 7497 4635 6939 24785 8763 8763 8763 8763 24151 i
*> 42.83.137.0/24     146.57.255.241        2735    202      0 11537 22388 7660 7497 4635 6939 24785 8763 8763 8763 8763 24151 i
*> 82.194.8.0/24      146.57.255.241        2188    202      0 11537 20965 202993 3356 29049 29584 i
*> 98.179.129.0/24    146.57.255.241        3358    202      0 11537 62600 209 209 209 209 12189 20454 53372 i
*> 103.26.196.0/24    146.57.255.241        3809    202      0 11537 23855 23855 24514 3257 132354 132874 i
*> 119.40.112.0/24    146.57.255.241        3809    202      0 11537 23855 23855 24514 3257 9930 38868 38868 38868 38868 ?
*> 119.40.124.0/24    146.57.255.241        3809    202      0 11537 23855 23855 24514 3257 9930 38868 38868 38868 38868 ?
*> 125.208.34.0/24    146.57.255.241        2735    202      0 11537 22388 7660 7497 4635 6939 24785 8763 8763 8763 8763 24151 i
*> 125.208.41.0/24    146.57.255.241        2735    202      0 11537 22388 7660 7497 4635 6939 24785 8763 8763 8763 8763 24151 i
*> 170.158.66.0/23    146.57.255.241        1379    202      0 11537 3754 46158 46158 46158 46158 46158 46887 3356 6453 55002 i
*  192.188.178.0/23   146.57.255.241        2566    202      0 11537 10466 88 6939 293 293 293 50 i
*> 195.162.72.0/23    146.57.255.241        2751    202      0 11537 8895 3356 57344 197304 i
*> 195.189.212.0/24   146.57.255.241        2751    202      0 11537 8895 6453 6762 39386 25233 i
*> 199.59.212.0/22    146.57.255.241        2693    202      0 11537 81 3356 19271 29901 i
*> 199.125.69.0/24    146.57.255.241        2751    202      0 11537 10578 14325 6939 7922 14265 i
*> 202.45.133.0/24    146.57.255.241        3809    202      0 11537 23855 23855 24514 3257 45630 24314 i
*> 203.119.28.0/24    146.57.255.241        2735    202      0 11537 22388 7660 7497 4635 6939 24785 8763 8763 8763 8763 24151 i
*  203.119.33.0/24    146.57.255.241        2735    202      0 11537 22388 7660 7497 3491 21859 24151 i

Probably even worse these have major commercial transit providers and I2PX in their AS Paths 
*> 24.199.205.0/24    146.57.255.241        2693    202      0 11537 81 11164 7843 11426 i
*> 64.5.147.0/24      146.57.255.241        2143    202      0 11537 40220 11164 22773 i
*> 65.254.166.0/24    146.57.255.241        2143    202      0 11537 40220 11164 6939 22299 i
*> 65.254.181.0/24    146.57.255.241        2143    202      0 11537 40220 11164 6939 22299 i
*> 65.254.182.0/24    146.57.255.241        2143    202      0 11537 40220 11164 6939 22299 i
*> 65.254.183.0/24    146.57.255.241        2143    202      0 11537 40220 11164 6939 22299 i
*> 65.254.184.0/24    146.57.255.241        2143    202      0 11537 40220 11164 6939 22299 47036 i
*> 65.254.185.0/24    146.57.255.241        2143    202      0 11537 40220 11164 6939 22299 47036 i
*> 128.82.0.0/16      146.57.255.241        2143    202      0 11537 40220 11164 22773 1201 1201 1201 1201 ?
*> 137.198.0.0/16     146.57.255.241        2143    202      0 11537 40220 11164 22773 14655 i
*> 151.188.0.0/16     146.57.255.241        2143    202      0 11537 40220 11164 22773 21984 i
*> 204.84.32.0/20     146.57.255.241        2693    202      0 11537 81 11164 6939 27446 i
*> 216.54.48.0/24     146.57.255.241        2143    202      0 11537 40220 11164 22773 i
*> 216.54.49.0/24     146.57.255.241        2143    202      0 11537 40220 11164 22773 i
*> 216.146.50.0/24    146.57.255.241        2143    202      0 11537 40220 11164 6939 22299 i
*> 216.235.226.0/24   146.57.255.241        2143    202      0 11537 40220 11164 6939 26202 i
*> 216.235.226.0/24   146.57.255.241        2143    202      0 11537 40220 11164 6939 26202 i

And these are Google Global Cache Anycast addresses that probably shouldn't be in the R&E table, especially coming from Africa. Please note that I receive 104.237.191.0/24 via local peering with Google and was routing it to Africa until I reduced the local pref of these routes.
*> 104.237.175.0/24   146.57.255.241        2751     10      0 11537 36944 327687 36040 i
*  104.237.191.0/24   146.57.255.241        2751     10      0 11537 36944 327687 36040 i

I suppose some of these could be temporary issues, but I've seen many of these in the R&E table for a while now. So, could someone from Internet2 or GRNOC work with these connectors and international partners to clean up these issues? Even if that means Internet2 needs to filter some of these routes.

Once cleaned up, I'd like to recommend sanity filters to prevent the reoccurrence of these types of issues. Minimally I'd like to suggest that connectors should not be allowed to recirculate I2PX and ESNet routes into the R&E table, but I'd also like major commercial ISP to be included too. 

Thanks
--
===============================================
David Farmer              
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota  
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================


--
===============================================
David Farmer              
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota  
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page