ntacpeering - Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Anti-Spoofing/uRPF discussion summary from Technology Exchange
Subject: NTAC Peering Working Group
List archive
Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Anti-Spoofing/uRPF discussion summary from Technology Exchange
Chronological Thread
- From: Pete Siemsen <>
- To:
- Cc: "" <>, "" <>
- Subject: Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Anti-Spoofing/uRPF discussion summary from Technology Exchange
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:57:48 -0700
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
IPv6 always lags behind :-) Few of the FRGP customers have IPv6. The short answer is "No".
-- Pete
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 6:08 PM, John Kristoff <> wrote:
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 22:01:34 +0000
Pete Siemsen <> wrote:
> . We plan to put uRPF on all interfaces - nobody gets to opt-out
Will all this be consistently done for IPv6 traffic as well?
John
- I2 - Anti-Spoofing/uRPF discussion summary from Technology Exchange, gcbrowni, 11/06/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Anti-Spoofing/uRPF discussion summary from Technology Exchange, David Farmer, 11/06/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Anti-Spoofing/uRPF discussion summary from Technology Exchange, Michael H Lambert, 11/06/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Anti-Spoofing/uRPF discussion summary from Technology Exchange, Karl Newell, 11/06/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Anti-Spoofing/uRPF discussion summary from Technology Exchange, David Farmer, 11/06/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Anti-Spoofing/uRPF discussion summary from Technology Exchange, John Hernandez, 11/06/2017
- RE: [Security-WG] I2 - Anti-Spoofing/uRPF discussion summary from Technology Exchange, Michael Hare, 11/07/2017
- RE: [Security-WG] I2 - Anti-Spoofing/uRPF discussion summary from Technology Exchange, Garrett, Seth B, 11/07/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Anti-Spoofing/uRPF discussion summary from Technology Exchange, Pete Siemsen, 11/07/2017
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Anti-Spoofing/uRPF discussion summary from Technology Exchange, Pete Siemsen, 11/27/2017
- RE: [Security-WG] I2 - Anti-Spoofing/uRPF discussion summary from Technology Exchange, Michael Hare, 11/07/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Anti-Spoofing/uRPF discussion summary from Technology Exchange, John Hernandez, 11/06/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Anti-Spoofing/uRPF discussion summary from Technology Exchange, David Farmer, 11/06/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Anti-Spoofing/uRPF discussion summary from Technology Exchange, Karl Newell, 11/06/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Anti-Spoofing/uRPF discussion summary from Technology Exchange, Michael H Lambert, 11/06/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Anti-Spoofing/uRPF discussion summary from Technology Exchange, David Farmer, 11/06/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.