netsec-sig - Re: [Security-WG] Is BGP safe for your ISP?
Subject: Internet2 Network Security SIG
List archive
- From: Larry Blunk <>
- To:
- Cc: Andrew Gallo <>
- Subject: Re: [Security-WG] Is BGP safe for your ISP?
- Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:53:21 -0400
The ROA Invalid prefixes Cloudflare is announcing for the test are 103.21.244.0/24 and 2606:4700:7000::/48.
The DNS name for the hosts being tested with an https connection is invalid.rpki.cloudflare.com. I can currently get
to both of these. The IPv6 path goes through a non-transit peer that is leaking the v6 announcement to us. Here's the
path for the IPv4 announcement :)
103.21.244.0/24 *[BGP/170] 1w4d 08:56:35, MED 99, localpref 110, from 198.108.93.41 AS path: 11164 7473 9498 13335 I, validation-state: unverified
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 2:31 PM Bob Harold <> wrote:
Thanks, I see I am late to the party!
--
Bob HaroldOn Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 2:25 PM Andrew Gallo <> wrote:There's an issue open on the projects Github page concerning this:On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 2:15 PM Bob Harold <> wrote:Please test with IPv4 and IPv6 separately! My campus says "Success" if I run from an IPv4-only host, but if I have IPv6 available, it says "Fail".
--
Bob HaroldDNS and DHCP Hostmaster - UMNet
Information and Technology Services (ITS)
734-512-7038On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 12:17 PM Larry Blunk <> wrote:It should probably be clarified that "implementing RPKI" here actually means performing RPK-based BGP filtering (and not simply registering ROA's). Your workplace actually uses AT&T as it's primary transit provider and thus already receives substantial benefit from AT&T's RPKI filtering. There's some additional benefit for performing RPKI filtering on peers that don't already do it, but in many cases the benefit is probably limited (the chances of a Google or Microsoft or Amazon announcing or leaking bogus routes is likely low). While Merit is not yet performing RPKI filtering (as noted, we get the benefit from AT&T doing it), we have registered ROA's for all prefixes that we have authority over in ARIN. This includes the Net 35 blocks we have reassigned to Umich. Umich has been discussing registering ROA's for their directly assigned blocks from ARIN.-Larry BlunkMerit--On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:45 AM Bob Harold <> wrote:My ISP (AT&T) says success. My work says fail. There was talk about implementing RPKI here recently. Having a test page is useful. Thanks.
--
Bob Harold
Larry Blunk
Senior Network Engineer
| 734.527.5725 p | 734.395.4363 c | 734.527.5790 f | www.merit.edu
880 Technology Drive, Suite B | Ann Arbor, MI 48108-8963
Learn More About Merit Services
Senior Network Engineer
| 734.527.5725 p | 734.395.4363 c | 734.527.5790 f | www.merit.edu
880 Technology Drive, Suite B | Ann Arbor, MI 48108-8963
Learn More About Merit Services
- Re: [Security-WG] Is BGP safe for your ISP?, (continued)
- Re: [Security-WG] Is BGP safe for your ISP?, Seesink, Frank, 04/20/2020
- Re: [Security-WG] Is BGP safe for your ISP?, Jesse Bowling, 04/20/2020
- Re: [Security-WG] Is BGP safe for your ISP?, A N, 04/20/2020
- Re: [Security-WG] Is BGP safe for your ISP?, Bob Harold, 04/20/2020
- Re: [Security-WG] Is BGP safe for your ISP?, Larry Blunk, 04/20/2020
- Re: [Security-WG] Is BGP safe for your ISP?, Bob Harold, 04/20/2020
- Re: [Security-WG] Is BGP safe for your ISP?, Andrew Gallo, 04/20/2020
- Re: [Security-WG] Is BGP safe for your ISP?, Bob Harold, 04/20/2020
- Re: [Security-WG] Is BGP safe for your ISP?, Andrew Gallo, 04/20/2020
- Re: [Security-WG] Is BGP safe for your ISP?, Montgomery, Douglas C. (Fed), 04/20/2020
- Re: [Security-WG] Is BGP safe for your ISP?, Larry Blunk, 04/20/2020
- Re: [Security-WG] Is BGP safe for your ISP?, Andrew Gallo, 04/20/2020
- Re: [Security-WG] Is BGP safe for your ISP?, Bob Harold, 04/20/2020
- Re: [Security-WG] Is BGP safe for your ISP?, Larry Blunk, 04/20/2020
- Re: [Security-WG] Is BGP safe for your ISP?, Bob Harold, 04/20/2020
- Re: [Security-WG] Is BGP safe for your ISP?, A N, 04/20/2020
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.