ndt-users list created

[Prabu Gj <>]

Hi,

        If my answer is wrong then, i am testing in same network which is ( client and server connected to same switch and its connected to firewall for routing to external).

Regards

Prabu

  

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Prabu Gj <> wrote:

HI,

          I have bonding br0 with eth0 port and other then loopback.

br0       Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr E0:69:95:73:1C:D3 
          inet addr:192.168.5.209  Bcast:192.168.5.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::e269:95ff:fe73:1cd3/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:7628959 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:836082 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
          RX bytes:5109976379 (4.7 GiB)  TX bytes:321323316 (306.4 MiB)

eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr E0:69:95:73:1C:D3 
          inet6 addr: fe80::e269:95ff:fe73:1cd3/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:19821791 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:1419032 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:11836874717 (11.0 GiB)  TX bytes:530072300 (505.5 MiB)
          Memory:fe400000-fe420000

lo        Link encap:Local Loopback 
          inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
          inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
          RX packets:4 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:4 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
          RX bytes:1872 (1.8 KiB)  TX bytes:1872 (1.8 KiB)

Regards

Prabu

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Jakub Sławiński <> wrote:

Hi,

how many network devices do you have on your ndt server? Which one would
you expect to be used during the test?


Regards,
  Jakub.

On 12/10/2013 10:41 AM, Prabu Gj wrote:
> Hi,
>
>     After increasing debug level out put is below.
>
> # web100clt -ll -ddd -n 192.168.5.209
> Testing network path for configuration and performance problems  --  Using
> IPv4 address
> * New Client, implements queuing feedback
> Requesting test suite:
>  > Middlebox test
>  > Simple firewall test
>  > C2S throughput test
>  > S2C throughput test
>  > META test
>  <-- Middlebox test -->
>   -- port: 3003
> Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Done
>  <-------------------->
>  <-- Simple firewall test -->
> checking for firewalls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>   -- port: 32773
>   -- time: 1
>   -- oport: 48942
> Done
>  <-------------------------->
>  <-- C2S throughput test -->
>   -- port: 3002
> running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . Protocol error -
> missed text message!
> C2S throughput test FAILED!
>  <-- S2C throughput test -->
> Protocol error - missed prepare message!
> S2C throughput test FAILED!
>  <-- META test -->
> Protocol error - missed prepare message!
> META test FAILED!
> Protocol error - expected results!  got '', msgtype=2
>
> Regards
> Prabu
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Jakub Sławiński
> <>wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> can you increase the debug level in your client?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>   Jakub.
>>
>> On 12/10/2013 09:47 AM, Prabu Gj wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>    Thanks for your reply, I am facing the problem in command line also.
>>>
>>> # web100clt -ll -n 192.168.5.209
>>> Testing network path for configuration and performance problems  --
>>  Using
>>> IPv4 address
>>> Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Done
>>> checking for firewalls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Done
>>> running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . .
>>> Protocol error - missed text message!
>>> C2S throughput test FAILED!
>>> Protocol error - missed prepare message!
>>> S2C throughput test FAILED!
>>> Protocol error - missed prepare message!
>>> META test FAILED!
>>> Protocol error - expected results!  got '', msgtype=2
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Prabu
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Jakub Sławiński
>>> <>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> are you able to perform tests successfully with the command line client?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>   Jakub.
>>>>
>>>> On 12/10/2013 08:46 AM, prabu.gj wrote:
>>>>> Hi Team,
>>>>>
>>>>>        Anybody help me on this issue please.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Prabu
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>