ndt-users - Re: Using NDT with 10 gigabit interfaces
Subject: ndt-users list created
List archive
- From: Byron Hicks <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: Using NDT with 10 gigabit interfaces
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 16:30:08 -0500
- Authentication-results: sfpop-ironport05.merit.edu; dkim=permerror (no key for signature)
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.1 mta2.noc.tx-learn.net 2AA4E65A4B
- Organization: Lonestar Education and Research Network
I'm having this same issue. I'm using pstoolkit 3.2.2, NDT 3.6.4, on
servers with Myri10GE interfaces.
NDT and bwctl using iperf get very different answers:
NDT:
[root@ps1-akard-dlls
init.d]# web100clt -n ps1-hardy-hstn
Testing network path for configuration and performance problems --
Using IPv4 address
Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
checking for firewalls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 8251.97 Mb/s
running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 1349.95 Mb/s
sending meta information to server . . . . . Done
The slowest link in the end-to-end path is a 10 Gbps 10 Gigabit
Ethernet/OC-192 subnet
Information: Other network traffic is congesting the link
Information [S2C]: Packet queuing detected: 83.58% (remote buffers)
Server 'ps1-hardy-hstn' is not behind a firewall. [Connection to the
ephemeral port was successful]
Client is not behind a firewall. [Connection to the ephemeral port was
successful]
Packet size is preserved End-to-End
Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End
Client IP addresses are preserved End-to-End
BWCTL/IPERF:
[root@ps1-akard-dlls
init.d]# bwctl -f g -s ps1-hardy-hstn
bwctl: Using tool: iperf
bwctl: 15 seconds until test results available
RECEIVER START
bwctl: exec_line: iperf -B 74.200.187.90 -s -f g -m -p 5058 -t 10
bwctl: start_tool: 3577554914.806607
------------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on TCP port 5058
Binding to local address 74.200.187.90
TCP window size: 0.00 GByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 15] local 74.200.187.90 port 5058 connected with 74.200.187.98 port 5058
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 15] 0.0-10.0 sec 10.9 GBytes 9.34 Gbits/sec
[ 15] MSS size 8948 bytes (MTU 8988 bytes, unknown interface)
bwctl: stop_exec: 3577554928.880958
RECEIVER END
[root@ps1-akard-dlls
init.d]# bwctl -f g -c ps1-hardy-hstn
bwctl: Using tool: iperf
bwctl: 15 seconds until test results available
RECEIVER START
bwctl: exec_line: iperf -B 74.200.187.98 -s -f g -m -p 5022 -t 10
bwctl: start_tool: 3577554939.532031
------------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on TCP port 5022
Binding to local address 74.200.187.98
TCP window size: 0.00 GByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 14] local 74.200.187.98 port 5022 connected with 74.200.187.90 port 5022
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 14] 0.0-10.0 sec 10.6 GBytes 9.09 Gbits/sec
[ 14] MSS size 8948 bytes (MTU 8988 bytes, unknown interface)
bwctl: stop_exec: 3577554952.353805
RECEIVER END
Any ideas why they would be so different?
On 01/30/2013 10:02 PM, Matt Mathis wrote:
> Try the c client to see if the problem is at the client or server end.
>
> Thanks,
> --MM--
> The best way to predict the future is to create it. - Alan Kay
>
> Privacy matters! We know from recent events that people are using our
> services to speak in defiance of unjust governments. We treat privacy
> and security as matters of life and death, because for some users, they are.
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Nat Stoddard
> <
> <mailto:>>
> wrote:
>
>
> Dear members:
>
> I thought I would try again to find an answer to this since I
> noticed recent messages related to NDT on 10 gig devices:
>
> I have tried several approaches to use NDT on a server with a 10 gigabit
> interface. I wonder if there are any limitations on the server to
> client
> tests using either web100clt or the Java client. I have not been
> able to get more than around 2.6 gigs
> server-to-client. The client-to-server test can go over 9 gigs even
> without
> extensive tuning. On the same server, I can get over 9 gigs in each
> direction
> to a neighbor server using iperf tests.
>
> Are there any tips on running NDT on a 10gig capable server?
>
> Thanks,
> Nat Stoddard
>
>
--
Byron Hicks
Lonestar Education and Research Network
office: 972-883-4645
google: 972-746-2549
aim/skype: byronhicks
--
Byron Hicks
Lonestar Education and Research Network
office: 972-883-4645
google: 972-746-2549
aim/skype: byronhicks
--
Byron Hicks
Lonestar Education and Research Network
office: 972-883-4645
google: 972-746-2549
aim/skype: byronhicks
--
Byron Hicks
Lonestar Education and Research Network
office: 972-883-4645
google: 972-746-2549
aim/skype: byronhicks
- Re: Using NDT with 10 gigabit interfaces, Byron Hicks, 05/14/2013
- Re: Using NDT with 10 gigabit interfaces, Aaron Brown, 05/15/2013
- Re: Using NDT with 10 gigabit interfaces, Brian Tierney, 05/15/2013
- Re: Using NDT with 10 gigabit interfaces, Byron Hicks, 05/15/2013
- Re: Using NDT with 10 gigabit interfaces, Aaron Brown, 05/15/2013
- Re: Using NDT with 10 gigabit interfaces, Richard Carlson, 05/15/2013
- Re: Using NDT with 10 gigabit interfaces, Nichole K. Boscia, 05/15/2013
- Re: Using NDT with 10 gigabit interfaces, Nat Stoddard, 05/16/2013
- Re: Using NDT with 10 gigabit interfaces, Richard Carlson, 05/16/2013
- Re: Using NDT with 10 gigabit interfaces, Byron Hicks, 05/17/2013
- Re: Using NDT with 10 gigabit interfaces, Aaron Brown, 05/17/2013
- Re: Using NDT with 10 gigabit interfaces, Richard Carlson, 05/16/2013
- Re: Using NDT with 10 gigabit interfaces, Byron Hicks, 05/15/2013
- Re: Using NDT with 10 gigabit interfaces, Brian Tierney, 05/15/2013
- Re: Using NDT with 10 gigabit interfaces, Aaron Brown, 05/15/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.