ndt-users - bandwidth asymmetry on a 10G link
Subject: ndt-users list created
List archive
- From: "Gholmieh, Nathalie" <>
- To: "''" <>
- Subject: bandwidth asymmetry on a 10G link
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:27:21 -0700
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
Hi- I have setup 2 NDT servers interconnected with a 10G link,
both using Myricom 10G NICs, on our local network. the two servers have
the same versions of NDT 3.6.1. when running NDT tests between the 2 servers, I get a C2S bandwidth
of approximately 10Gbps, but the S2C bandwidth is not exceeding 3 Gbps, and
that is on BOTH machines: [root@M ~]# web100clt -n T -4 -l Testing network path for configuration and performance
problems -- Using IPv4 address Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. Done checking for firewalls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . .
. 9351.25 Mb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . .
2605.19 Mb/s The slowest link in the end-to-end path is a 10 Gbps 10
Gigabit Ethernet/OC-192 subnet Information [S2C]: Packet queuing detected: 72.52% (local
buffers) Server ‘T’ is not behind a firewall. [Connection
to the ephemeral port was successful] Client is not behind a firewall. [Connection to the
ephemeral port was successful] ------
Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Web100 reports the Round trip time = 4.09 msec;the Packet
size = 8960 Bytes; and There were 337 packets retransmitted, 9749 duplicate acks
received, and 10089 SACK blocks received Packets arrived out-of-order 4.32% of the time. The connection stalled 1 times due to packet loss. The connection was idle 0.20 seconds (2.00%) of the time. This connection is receiver limited 2.41% of the time. This connection is sender limited 76.06% of the time. This connection is network limited 21.54% of the time. Web100 reports TCP negotiated the
optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON; Scaling Factors - Server=9,
Client=9 The theoretical network limit is 2148.73 Mbps The NDT server has a 16384 KByte buffer which limits the
throughput to 31295.84 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 12282 KByte buffer which limits
the throughput to 23459.46 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to
23533.01 Mbps Client Data reports link is ' 9', Client Acks report
link is ' 9' Server Data reports link is ' 9', Server Acks report
link is ' 9' Packet size is preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is
modifying the Server's IP address Server says [<IP>]
but Client says [ T] Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is
modifying the Client's IP address Server says [<IP2>]
but Client says [M] [root@M ~]# I have these sysctl values set on both servers: net.core.rmem_max = 16777216 net.core.wmem_max = 16777216 net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 65536 16777216 net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 87380 16777216 net.core.netdev_max_backlog = 250000 net.ipv4.tcp_no_metrics_save = 1 I have also noticed that same asymmetry in the bandwidth
while transferring an FTP file back and forth on the same link between the two
servers. Note that the traffic both ways is using the same path. I am wondering why there is a difference between the sent
and received bandwidth, and what parameters I should tune to use the full 10G
both ways. Any ideas are very appreciated. Thanks! Nathalie~ |
- bandwidth asymmetry on a 10G link, Gholmieh, Nathalie, 04/15/2010
- Re: bandwidth asymmetry on a 10G link, Rich Carlson, 04/15/2010
- RE: bandwidth asymmetry on a 10G link, Gholmieh, Nathalie, 04/19/2010
- Re: bandwidth asymmetry on a 10G link, Scott Bertilson, 04/19/2010
- Message not available
- RE: bandwidth asymmetry on a 10G link, Gholmieh, Nathalie, 04/21/2010
- Re: bandwidth asymmetry on a 10G link, Rich Carlson, 04/21/2010
- RE: bandwidth asymmetry on a 10G link, Gholmieh, Nathalie, 04/21/2010
- RE: bandwidth asymmetry on a 10G link, Gholmieh, Nathalie, 04/19/2010
- Re: bandwidth asymmetry on a 10G link, Rich Carlson, 04/15/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.