ndt-users - gigabit slower than fast-e
Subject: ndt-users list created
List archive
- From:
- To:
- Subject: gigabit slower than fast-e
- Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 00:04:18 -0500 (EST)
I'm troubleshooting data transfers between New Jersey and California over
internet2. The slowest link is 155 Mbps, rtt is 90 ms, servers and switches
are gigabit.
Tuning tcp buffers only gets the throughput to 11.9 Mbits/sec. If I change
the switch port to 100 Full, the throughput increases to 84.4 Mbits/sec.
ndt reports packet loss and duplicate acks when the connection is gigabit,
the 100 full connection has no packet loss.
The relevant ndt output is below. iperf also backs up these results.
Is there a known problem with gig switch negotiation? No tcp buffer setting
improves the performance when gigabit.
Thanks
ndt:
gigabit connection:
running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 13.67 Mb/s
running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 14.30 Mb/s
There were 7 packets retransmitted, 178 duplicate acks received, and 245 SACK
blocks received
Packets arrived out-of-order 2.64% of the time.
The connection stalled 1 times due to packet loss.
The connection was idle 0.30 seconds (3.00%) of the time.
100 full connection:
running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 11.80 Mb/s
running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 20.46 Mb/s
No packet loss was observed.
iperf:
gigabit:
[ 3] 0.0-60.1 sec 85.3 MBytes 11.9 Mbits/sec
100 full:
[ 3] 0.0-60.2 sec 606 MBytes 84.4 Mbits/sec
- gigabit slower than fast-e, abbott, 03/06/2008
- Re: gigabit slower than fast-e, Matthew J Zekauskas, 03/06/2008
- Re: gigabit slower than fast-e, Matthew J Zekauskas, 03/06/2008
- Re: gigabit slower than fast-e, Bill Abbott, 03/06/2008
- Re: gigabit slower than fast-e, Jim Cotton, 03/07/2008
- Re: gigabit slower than fast-e, Bill Abbott, 03/07/2008
- Re: gigabit slower than fast-e, Jim Cotton, 03/07/2008
- Re: gigabit slower than fast-e, Bill Abbott, 03/06/2008
- Re: gigabit slower than fast-e, Bill Abbott, 03/06/2008
- Re: gigabit slower than fast-e, Richard Carlson, 03/07/2008
- Re: gigabit slower than fast-e, Bill Abbott, 03/07/2008
- Re: gigabit slower than fast-e, Matt Mathis, 03/07/2008
- Re: gigabit slower than fast-e, Richard Carlson, 03/07/2008
- Re: gigabit slower than fast-e, Richard Carlson, 03/07/2008
- Re: gigabit slower than fast-e, Matthew J Zekauskas, 03/06/2008
- Re: gigabit slower than fast-e, Matthew J Zekauskas, 03/06/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.