ndt-users - Re: Slow Inbound Tests
Subject: ndt-users list created
List archive
- From: Richard Carlson <>
- To: Clayton Keller <>,
- Subject: Re: Slow Inbound Tests
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 18:19:46 -0400
Hi Clayton;
Hum, I just ran a test against your server and it completed without any problem. I did not get any errors, just the report below. I am surprised to see that the connection is sender limited (perhaps it's a CPU issue over this network path).
How frequently does this delay occur? (often, frequently, occationally, ...) Is there a record in the web100srv.log file?
FYI, after printing the server to client message, the client sits in a read loop. There are a couple of timers that should prevent this loop from running on forever. At the end of the loop a message is written to the Java console (do you see this message?). It then prints the speed on the screen and goes on to grab the test results from the server. I'll need to think about this some more and setup my local test network. It would help if you could tell me what the network that failed looked like (is it a simple client -- switch -- server or something more complex.
Rich
Comments:
Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 3.92Mb/s
running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 40.37Mb/s
The slowest link in the end-to-end path is a 100 Mbps Full duplex Fast Ethernet subnet
Web100 reports the Round trip time = 34.03 msec; the Packet size = 1380 Bytes; and
No packet loss - but packets arrived out-of-order 9.48% of the time
This connection is sender limited 98.00% of the time.
This connection is network limited 1.32% of the time.
The theoretical network limit is 309.42 Mbps
The NDT server has a 16384.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 3761.82 Mbps
Your PC/Workstation has a 257.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 59.09 Mbps
The network based flow control limits the throughput to 43.93 Mbps
End Of Email Message
At 04:11 PM 10/13/2005, Clayton Keller wrote:
Clayton Keller wrote:
Richard Carlson wrote:Rich,
Hi Clayton;Thanks Richard,
This is a bug in the web100srv code. I forgot to shutdown the control socket at the end of the test. If there are multiple clients then the final results are sent in a LIFO manner, so the first client needs to wait until all subsequent clients are done before the results are returned.
I'll issue a patched version soon. In the mean time you can patch your version by hand by adding the line "shutdown(ctlsockfd, SHUT_RDWR);" to the web100srv.c file (on line 1126).
Let me know if that fixes things.
Rich
---------------------------------------------------------------
Original code:
if (admin_view == 1) {
totalcnt = calculate(SumRTT, CountRTT, CongestionSignals, PktsOut, DupAcksIn, AckPktsIn,
CurrentMSS, SndLimTimeRwin, SndLimTimeCwnd, SndLimTimeSender,
MaxRwinRcvd, CurrentCwnd, Sndbuf, DataBytesOut, mismatch, bad_cable,
(int)bwout, (int)bwin, c2sdata, s2cack, 1, debug);
gen_html((int)bwout, (int)bwin, MinRTT, PktsRetrans, Timeouts,
Sndbuf, MaxRwinRcvd, CurrentCwnd, mismatch, bad_cable, totalcnt,
debug);
}
/* printf("Saved data to log file\n"); */
/* exit(0); */
}
main(argc, argv)
----------------------------------------------------------
Modified code
if (admin_view == 1) {
totalcnt = calculate(SumRTT, CountRTT, CongestionSignals, PktsOut, DupAcksIn, AckPktsIn,
CurrentMSS, SndLimTimeRwin, SndLimTimeCwnd, SndLimTimeSender,
MaxRwinRcvd, CurrentCwnd, Sndbuf, DataBytesOut, mismatch, bad_cable,
(int)bwout, (int)bwin, c2sdata, s2cack, 1, debug);
gen_html((int)bwout, (int)bwin, MinRTT, PktsRetrans, Timeouts,
Sndbuf, MaxRwinRcvd, CurrentCwnd, mismatch, bad_cable, totalcnt,
debug);
}
shutdown(ctlsockfd, SHUT_RDWR);
/* printf("Saved data to log file\n"); */
/* exit(0); */
}
main(argc, argv)
At 01:54 PM 10/12/2005, Clayton Keller wrote:
I wanted to address this to the list. I believe there was a similar post a week or so back but I wanted to address this clean.
I currently have web100srv running from /etc/init.d/ndt with the following:
/usr/local/sbin/web100srv -a -m -l /var/log/web100/web100srv.log
The system is running on Fedora Core 4 using a patached 2.6.13 kernel from kernel.org.
The server itself is also sitting behind a PIX firewall.
We have noticed that the Outbound Test will run rather quickly, but when the Inbound, server to client, test is ran it can take upwards of several minutes to complete, many times as much as 4 minutes. There are other times where from the end user's point-of-view it appears the test never completes although you can see results for the test appear in the web100.log file. The test though will continue to sit on the unning 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . .
portion of the test, and many users are beginning to just close out the window.
At this point I am looking for general issues that I can look into and possibly run debug against as far as these tests are concerned.
Clayton Keller
------------------------------------
Richard A. Carlson e-mail:
Network Engineer phone: (734) 352-7043
Internet2 fax: (734) 913-4255
1000 Oakbrook Dr; Suite 300
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
I've got a test box I will apply and test to, then look at applying this to the live box and get some good "in the field testing". I'll let you know how things go.
Clay
It appears that there is still a long delay in the amount of time it takes to complete the Inbound test (several minutes from my own personal attempts). Could we be looking at network issues on my end. At time I do see the following message returned as well:
"Information: Other network traffic is congesting the link"
If you would like to try it out for yourself and see if you can recreate this delay, the test is available at:
http://speedtest.ruraltel.net:7123/
I'd be grateful for any other info I can get, as far as things to look at and run debug against.
Clay
------------------------------------
Richard A. Carlson e-mail:
Network Engineer phone: (734) 352-7043
Internet2 fax: (734) 913-4255
1000 Oakbrook Dr; Suite 300
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
- Slow Inbound Tests, Clayton Keller, 10/12/2005
- Re: Slow Inbound Tests, Richard Carlson, 10/12/2005
- Re: Slow Inbound Tests, Clayton Keller, 10/12/2005
- Re: Slow Inbound Tests, Clayton Keller, 10/13/2005
- Re: Slow Inbound Tests, chet, 10/13/2005
- Re: Slow Inbound Tests, Clayton Keller, 10/13/2005
- Re: Slow Inbound Tests, Richard Carlson, 10/13/2005
- Re: Slow Inbound Tests, Clayton Keller, 10/13/2005
- Re: Slow Inbound Tests, Richard Carlson, 10/13/2005
- Re: Slow Inbound Tests, chet, 10/13/2005
- Re: Slow Inbound Tests, Mike Iglesias, 10/13/2005
- Re: Slow Inbound Tests, Martyn, 10/13/2005
- Re: Slow Inbound Tests, Mike Iglesias, 10/13/2005
- Re: Slow Inbound Tests, chet, 10/13/2005
- Re: Slow Inbound Tests, Richard Carlson, 10/13/2005
- Re: Slow Inbound Tests, chet, 10/13/2005
- Re: Slow Inbound Tests, Clayton Keller, 10/13/2005
- Re: Slow Inbound Tests, Clayton Keller, 10/12/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Slow Inbound Tests, Pepmiller, Craig E., 10/14/2005
- Message not available
- RE: Slow Inbound Tests, Richard Carlson, 10/14/2005
- Re: Slow Inbound Tests, Clayton Keller, 10/17/2005
- Re: Slow Inbound Tests, Richard Carlson, 10/17/2005
- Re: Slow Inbound Tests, Clayton Keller, 10/17/2005
- Re: Slow Inbound Tests, Richard Carlson, 10/17/2005
- Re: Slow Inbound Tests, Clayton Keller, 10/17/2005
- Re: Slow Inbound Tests, Richard Carlson, 10/17/2005
- Re: Slow Inbound Tests, Clayton Keller, 10/17/2005
- RE: Slow Inbound Tests, Richard Carlson, 10/14/2005
- Message not available
- Re: Slow Inbound Tests, Richard Carlson, 10/12/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.