ndt-dev - Re: [ndt-dev] Comment on revision r965 in ndt
Subject: NDT-DEV email list created
List archive
- From: Tiziana Refice <>
- To:
- Cc: "<>" <>
- Subject: Re: [ndt-dev] Comment on revision r965 in ndt
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 07:35:01 +0000
SGTM
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:33 PM, <> wrote:
Comment by :Line 126: + "access to _javascript_.");
Line-by-line comments:
File: /branches/Issue127/flash-client/src/NDTUtils.as (r965)
===============================================================================
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How about we merge this change, then I will go back and make your requested change to all the three instances where this happens. Since it's not only here that I print that hardcoded error message, it probably makes sense to have it as a separate change. Is that okay?
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/detail?r=965
- [ndt-dev] Comment on revision r965 in ndt, ndt, 03/04/2014
- Re: [ndt-dev] Comment on revision r965 in ndt, Tiziana Refice, 03/12/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.