megaconference - [Megacon] RE: Skype for Business
Subject: Megaconference
List archive
- From: "Zinner, Mike (MNIT)" <>
- To: Jon Winterbottom <>, "" <>
- Subject: [Megacon] RE: Skype for Business
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 11:17:41 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 156.99.119.34) smtp.mailfrom=state.mn.us; brocku.ca; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;brocku.ca; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=state.mn.us;
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
In a word - QoS
-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:]
On Behalf Of Jon Winterbottom
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 5:53 PM
To:
Subject: [Megacon] Skype for Business
Hi all, I'm finding myself posting a lot about skype for business recently.
Since I'm feeling the push to go with S4B as our primary solution for all
things video conferencing, I would like to know why others haven't? Or if
you are using it what is the primary use. Is there anyone out there that
has successfully implemented S4B that is using it to conduct online courses?
Thanks to those who have already commented on some of my previous posts.
Regards,
Sent from my iPad
- [Megacon] Skype for Business, Jon Winterbottom, 05/09/2016
- [Megacon] RE: Skype for Business, Zinner, Mike (MNIT), 05/10/2016
- Re: [Megacon] RE: Skype for Business, Matt Carner, 05/10/2016
- Re: [Megacon] Skype for Business, Koorus Bookan, 05/10/2016
- Re: [Megacon] Skype for Business, Todd Austin, 05/10/2016
- [Megacon] RE: Skype for Business, Zinner, Mike (MNIT), 05/10/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.