mace-opensaml-users - [OpenSAML] SAML profile for XACML 2.0 (ver 2) support

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

[OpenSAML] SAML profile for XACML 2.0 (ver 2) support

From: Kaleb Pederson <>
To:
Subject: [OpenSAML] SAML profile for XACML 2.0 (ver 2) support
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:23:33 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=rerYx/tSNVufFh4EuaG79AInjOnj3LDuK3GjySV3wRgSE7C1TP4yxsPXIPp65Adhf6 /1qSLDXZ1efe9c5uuQK3oMpye+JNQL+DStDJQQ/BFAozjreHgQ1NO3ebK/TldszXdMRm SvdGcZGmIF3V8g237Uq0wfTlTEzQt/7/e/tnA=

I ran across a bug report and a message on this group that indicate OpenSAML
supports the SAML profile for XACML 2.0 version 2.0, working draft 5 rather
than the current (?) though somewhat dated SAML profile for XACML 2.0.

bug report:
- https://bugs.internet2.edu/jira/browse/JOST-34

message:
- http://groups.google.com/group/opensaml-users/msg/7788d0a5faf6bec5

Was this issue not addressed by the published errata or its associated
schmema? (http://www.oasis-
open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=xacml#XACML20errata)

Despite two updated schemas and an errata being available for the initial
profile, the errata also links to the version 2.0 wd 5 document that you
reference in the bug report thread above, which I find a bit confusing --
it's
hard to tell whether the updated errata is current or the version 2.0
document.

Could somebody clarify for a slightly confused soul? Thanks.

--
Kaleb Pederson

Blog - http://kalebpederson.com
Twitter - http://twitter.com/kalebpederson

[OpenSAML] SAML profile for XACML 2.0 (ver 2) support, Kaleb Pederson, 08/30/2010

List archive

[OpenSAML] SAML profile for XACML 2.0 (ver 2) support