mace-opensaml-users - Re: [OpenSAML] Problem with XACMLPolicyStatement
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Chad La Joie <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [OpenSAML] Problem with XACMLPolicyStatement
- Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 08:35:48 -0400
- Organization: Itumi, LLC
On 7/31/10 8:31 AM,
wrote:
But the assertion created using a XACMLPolicyStatement does not validate
against
the schema in the oasis home page. What is wrong in this case?
Which schema? The "standard" one is invalid, it extends SAML in a way that is not allowed. There is a draft one that was meant to replace the current standard that fixes this. That's what OpenSAML implements and I'm pretty sure that's documented in the javadoc.
QName statementElementName = new QName("Statement",SAMLConstants.SAML20_NS);
Your arguments are switched around.
--
Chad La Joie
http://itumi.biz
trusted identities, delivered
- [OpenSAML] Problem with XACMLPolicyStatement, , 07/31/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Problem with XACMLPolicyStatement, Chad La Joie, 07/31/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Problem with XACMLPolicyStatement, , 07/31/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Problem with XACMLPolicyStatement, Chad La Joie, 07/31/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Problem with XACMLPolicyStatement, , 07/31/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Problem with XACMLPolicyStatement, Chad La Joie, 07/31/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Problem with XACMLPolicyStatement, , 07/31/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Problem with XACMLPolicyStatement, Chad La Joie, 07/31/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Problem with XACMLPolicyStatement, , 07/31/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Problem with XACMLPolicyStatement, , 07/31/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Problem with XACMLPolicyStatement, Chad La Joie, 07/31/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Problem with XACMLPolicyStatement, , 07/31/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Problem with XACMLPolicyStatement, Chad La Joie, 07/31/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Problem with XACMLPolicyStatement, , 07/31/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Problem with XACMLPolicyStatement, Chad La Joie, 07/31/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.