mace-opensaml-users - Re: [OpenSAML] Signature not valid because of namespace order
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Guzman Llambias <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [OpenSAML] Signature not valid because of namespace order
- Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 11:47:48 -0300 (UYT)
Yes! exactly, that's what I mean.
Thanks for all. I look up for serialization issues
Regards
Guzman
----- Mensaje original -----
De: "Scott Cantor"
<>
Para:
Enviados: Martes, 6 de Abril 2010 21:13:47 GMT -03:00 Montevideo
Asunto: RE: [OpenSAML] Signature not valid because of namespace order
> And if I move them as the examples I put? that would break the signature?
If by "moved" you mean the fact that the declarations appear before the XML
attributes instead of after, c14n handles that issue, it wouldn't break
anything.
-- Scott
- Signature not valid because of namespace order, Guzman Llambias, 04/06/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature not valid because of namespace order, Scott Cantor, 04/06/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Signature not valid because of namespace order, Guzman Llambias, 04/06/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature not valid because of namespace order, Scott Cantor, 04/06/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature not valid because of namespace order, Scott Cantor, 04/06/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Signature not valid because of namespace order, Guzman Llambias, 04/07/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Signature not valid because of namespace order, Guzman Llambias, 04/06/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature not valid because of namespace order, Scott Cantor, 04/06/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.