mace-opensaml-users - which one is correct for saml token in the SecurityToken Reference.

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

From: "wss4j wei" <>
To:
Subject: which one is correct for saml token in the SecurityToken Reference.
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 16:36:41 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=BjgUFAGA4Lz1HHD+q21kgkGBq2kRQGbjgxzsFLYl+rFAk4f/gN0TrQR+8v4R2nOvXck0HfmZp/kO90kD57M5WwujoJvKdSaXD9v4Px/7ocetJ31Nw7VElqKfr/xvuaCKcHGWfooIvNU5QZ0H1Iyaw85tEnhGTtv5hWBggkuw2fc=

<wsse:SecurityTokenReference wsu:Id=?q01obcQc22Occlbrou7GRA22? xmlns:wsu=?http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd?> <wsse:KeyIdentifier ValueType=?mQXwNktATaW29IAV7bfulw22http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/oasis-wss-saml-token-profile-1.0#SAMLAssertionID?>mQXwNktATaW29IAV7bfulw22</wsse:KeyIdentifier></wsse:SecurityTokenReference>

or
<wsse:SecurityTokenReference wsu:Id=?STRSAMLId-24964246? xmlns:wsu=?http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd?> <*wsse:Reference URI*=?#f73942eda6dc8241481afb037074883e? ValueType=?http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/XX/oasis-2004XX-wss-saml-token-profile-1.0#SAMLAssertion-1.1?/></wsse:SecurityTokenReference>.

should SecurityTokenReference have <wsse:KeyIdentifier> or <wsse:Reference URI> for saml token ?
which one is correct for saml token ?

which one is correct for saml token in the SecurityToken Reference., wss4j wei, 05/14/2008
- RE: [OpenSAML] which one is correct for saml token in the SecurityToken Reference., Scott Cantor, 05/14/2008