OpenSAML user discussion

[Brent Putman <>]

No, the decoder was wrong.  "TARGET" is correct for SAML 1.  Looks like cut-and-paste error from the SAML 2 POST decoder, which uses "RelayState".  Now fixed.


Clifford Johnson wrote:

The single test case in this class fails (in my environment) with the following details:

 

org.opensaml.saml1.binding.decoding.HTTPPostDecoderTest#testDecode

 

junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<relay> but was:<null>

    at org.opensaml.saml1.binding.decoding.HTTPPostDecoderTest.testDecode(HTTPPostDecoderTest.java:47)

 

The failure is the result of BasicSAMLMessageContext.getRelayState method returning null instead of the expected value.  The expected value is set in a “TARGET” parameter.  Should this be the “RelayState” parameter instead (which is where HTTPPostDecoder expects to find it)?

 

Clifford