OpenSAML user discussion

[Chad La Joie <>]

I think that will work, but there is no generic means of doing it (i.e. 
I can't create a divorce(XMLObject) method).  Note that you have to do 
both calls, break the link from child to parent and the link from parent 
to child.

Asa Hardcastle wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I understand that the library does not allow an xml child to be the 
> child of two different parents.   Is there anything wrong with simply 
> calling myobject.setParent(null) on the child?  It seems to work.   So 
> does removing it from the parent with 
> myparent.getMyObjectList().remove(myobject)
>
> My use case is that I have a SAML Assertion (sometimes an 
> EncryptedAssertion) that is passed inside of a SOAP header as a bearer 
> token.  Once I have obtained the credentials, I want to make a number of 
> requests without re-authenticating.
>
>
>
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: 
> {urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion}EncryptedAssertion is already the 
> child of another XMLObject and may not be inserted in to this list
>     at 
> org.opensaml.xml.util.XMLObjectChildrenList.setParent(XMLObjectChildrenList.java:202) 
>
>     at 
> org.opensaml.xml.util.XMLObjectChildrenList.add(XMLObjectChildrenList.java:147) 
>
>     at 
> org.opensaml.xml.util.XMLObjectChildrenList.add(XMLObjectChildrenList.java:1) 
>
>     at java.util.AbstractList.add(AbstractList.java:89)
>     at org.openliberty.wsc.WSFMessage.createWSFMessage(WSFMessage.java:151)
>     at 
> org.openliberty.wsc.DiscoveryService.invokeWithEPR(DiscoveryService.java:262) 
>
>     at 
> org.openliberty.wsc.test.ClientLibTest.queryDiscoveryServiceForServiceEPRs(ClientLibTest.java:639) 
>
>     ...
>
>
> thanks,
>
> asa
>
>
>
>
> > You can certainly sign them with the same *key*, but you can't reuse the
> > same Signature object.  You need to create a new Signature object for
> > each SignableXMLObject that will be signed, and set all the parameters
> > on each Signature appropriately.  The library error you're seeing occurs
> > because an XMLObject can not be the child of two different parents.
> >
> > This library issue aside, you probably wouldn't want to do this anyway.
> > It is likely that the Reference element(s) in the two signatures (as
> > signified by the the ContentReference object(s) that you add to the
> > Signature object) would need to be different, since they likely point to
> > different things that are being signed.  As far as I know, this would
> > definitely be the case in any SAML signing one might want to do.
> >
> > --Brent
> >
> >
> > Mike Klein wrote:
> > > I know at a minimum it is assertions most important to sign but I
> > > thought I should sign enclosing response as well...but I get error when
> > > doing this.
> > >
> > >        Signature sig = SAMLUtil.getSignature(response);
> > >        assertion.setSignature(sig);
> > >        String signedEncodedResponse = SAMLUtil.marshall(response, sig,
> > > true);
> > >
> > > As soon as I set signature on assertion I get following:
> > >
> > > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException:
> > > org.opensaml.xml.signature.impl.SignatureImpl cannot be added - it is
> > > already the child of another SAML Object
> > >    at
> > > org.opensaml.xml.AbstractXMLObject.prepareForAssignment(AbstractXMLObject.java:370) 
> > >
> > >
> > > How should I be going about this? Is perhaps signing just broken in this
> > > sense?
>
>
>
>
> --
> Asa Hardcastle, Technical Lead, openLiberty ID-WSF ClientLib
> Tel: +1.413.429.1044 Skype: subsystem7

--
SWITCH
Serving Swiss Universities
--------------------------
Chad La Joie, Software Engineer, Security
Werdstrasse 2, P.O. Box, 8021 Zürich, Switzerland
phone +41 44 268 15 75, fax +41 44 268 15 68
,
 http://www.switch.ch