OpenSAML user discussion

[Chad La Joie <>]

Shouldn't be, no.  They wouldn't have to be static really, but working 
with them would be a pain if they weren't.

Asa Hardcastle wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am building out more classes using java-xmltooling, and extending 
> classes that I have already built.   Is there a problem (threading 
> possibly) with using static internal classes to represent the 
> builder/marshaller/unmarshaller?
>
>
> For example:
>
> MyElement.java
>
>
> would contain:
>
> MyElement:MyElementBuilder
> MyElement:MyElementMarshaller
> MyElement:MyElementUnmarshaller
>
>
>
>
> thanks,
>
> asa
>
>
>
>
> --
> Asa Hardcastle, Technical Lead, openLiberty ID-WSF ClientLib
> Tel: +1.413.429.1044 Skype: subsystem7

--
SWITCH
Serving Swiss Universities
--------------------------
Chad La Joie, Software Engineer, Security
Werdstrasse 2, P.O. Box, 8021 Zürich, Switzerland
phone +41 44 268 15 75, fax +41 44 268 15 68
,
 http://www.switch.ch