mace-opensaml-users - RE: signing a SAML response - C++

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

RE: signing a SAML response - C++

From: "Scott Cantor" <>
To: <>
Subject: RE: signing a SAML response - C++
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 15:17:24 -0500
Organization: The Ohio State University

> > The ContentReference object is valid regardless of whether I call
> > assertion->getContentReference() or signature->getContentReference().
>
> Do not call assertion->getContentReference. Looking at it, I think it was
> supposed to be protected but I have to review the code. That definitely
> isn't what you want in order to change the digest.

It's in fact now gone, I must have forgotten to remove that method some time
back.

-- Scott

signing a SAML response - C++, Brian Sheely, 01/02/2008
- RE: signing a SAML response - C++, Scott Cantor, 01/02/2008
  - RE: signing a SAML response - C++, Brian Sheely, 01/02/2008
    - RE: signing a SAML response - C++, Scott Cantor, 01/02/2008
      - RE: signing a SAML response - C++, Brian Sheely, 01/03/2008
        
        RE: signing a SAML response - C++, Scott Cantor, 01/03/2008
    - Message not available
      - RE: signing a SAML response - C++, Scott Cantor, 01/02/2008

List archive

RE: signing a SAML response - C++