Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - RE: Validation on signing of HTTPRedirectDeflateDecoder

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

RE: Validation on signing of HTTPRedirectDeflateDecoder


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Alex Vilensky" <>
  • To:
  • Subject: RE: Validation on signing of HTTPRedirectDeflateDecoder
  • Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 19:01:16 -0400

Does that site accept base64 encoded messages?

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Cantor
[mailto:]

Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 6:51 PM
To:

Subject: RE: Validation on signing of HTTPRedirectDeflateDecoder

> soon. Do you (or anyone) have or know of any good test vector data
> with which to test the simple signing (non-XML signature) use cases?
> Known good test data for both the HTTP-Redirect DEFLATE and the draft
> HTTP-POST-SimpleSign bindings would be of use, e.g. the encoded/signed

> query string or POST form, and associated key/key pair used for
> signing. I don't trust our encoders (yet) to generate the stuff to
> test the validation... :-)

You could verify your encoder output against this:

http://rnd.feide.no/saml2debug/

As far as signature test data is concerned, you could use the SP to
generate something, it's been tested a few different times and is known
to be correct.

-- Scott






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page