mace-opensaml-users - cpp-xmltooling and msxml collisions
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "George Stanchev" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: cpp-xmltooling and msxml collisions
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 09:08:03 -0700
Hi Scott,
I am often getting collisions between the msxml.h in the platform SDK
and some xercesc::DOMDocument declarations. In one of my projects, I
was able to neutralize this using the WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN macro which
forces not loading of MsXml.h but in other projects I am still getting
this collision. I wonder if explicit namespace declaration of xercesc
object will not make things easier. For example, I am talking about
ParserPool.h in which several methods return DOMDocument*...
George Stanchev
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail
and destroy all copies of the original message.
- RE: dependencies licensing question, (continued)
- RE: dependencies licensing question, Scott Cantor, 04/13/2007
- RE: dependencies licensing question, George Stanchev, 04/13/2007
- RE: dependencies licensing question, Scott Cantor, 04/13/2007
- Message not available
- RE: dependencies licensing question, Scott Cantor, 04/13/2007
- PLEASE REMOVE, Cecilia Ramirez, 04/14/2007
- Re: PLEASE REMOVE, Steve Olshansky, 04/14/2007
- VC7.1 compilation of cpp-xmltooling, George Stanchev, 04/16/2007
- RE: VC7.1 compilation of cpp-xmltooling, George Stanchev, 04/16/2007
- RE: VC7.1 compilation of cpp-xmltooling, George Stanchev, 04/16/2007
- RE: VC7.1 compilation of cpp-xmltooling, Scott Cantor, 04/16/2007
- cpp-xmltooling and msxml collisions, George Stanchev, 04/17/2007
- RE: VC7.1 compilation of cpp-xmltooling, George Stanchev, 04/16/2007
- RE: VC7.1 compilation of cpp-xmltooling, George Stanchev, 04/16/2007
- RE: dependencies licensing question, George Stanchev, 04/13/2007
- RE: dependencies licensing question, Scott Cantor, 04/13/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.