OpenSAML user discussion

[Chad La Joie <>]

From the OpenSAML documentation:
https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/SHIB/OSTwoUsrManJavaAnyTypes

Laurent CHARTIER wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm wondering why unmarshalling an Attribute element uses
> AttributeUnmarshaller from opensaml.saml2.core and unmarshalling an
> AttributeValue uses ElementProxyUnmarshaller from opensaml.xml.
> Must I implement the real unmarshaller and add the configuration to the
> file?
>  
> Log from unmarshalling a response (SAML2):
> Unmarshalling child element
> {urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion}Attribute with unmarshaller
> org.opensaml.saml2.core.impl.AttributeUnmarshaller
> ...
> Unmarshalling child element
> {urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion}AttributeValue with unmarshaller
> org.opensaml.xml.ElementProxyUnmarshaller
>  
> Thanks.
> Ce message est prot?g? par les r?gles relatives au secret des
> correspondances. Il est donc ?tabli ? destination exclusive de son
> destinataire. Celui-ci peut donc contenir des informations
> confidentielles. La divulgation de ces informations est ? ce titre
> rigoureusement interdite. Si vous avez re?u ce message par erreur, merci
> de le renvoyer ? l'exp?diteur dont l'adresse e-mail figure ci-dessus et
> de d?truire le message ainsi que toute pi?ce jointe. This message is
> protected by the secrecy of correspondence rules. Therefore, this
> message is intended solely for the attention of the addressee. This
> message may contain privileged or confidential information, as such the
> disclosure of these informations is strictly forbidden. If, by mistake,
> you have received this message, please return this message to the
> addressser whose e-mail address is written above and destroy this
> message and all files attached.

-- 
Chad La Joie             2052-C Harris Bldg
OIS-Middleware           202.687.0124