mace-opensaml-users - RE: Question SAML Exception
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>, <>
- Subject: RE: Question SAML Exception
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:12:42 -0500
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> The SAML Message we get has an error code
> (EGOV_USER_LEVEL2_LOCKED). That SAML message does not have
> thus any assertion, but only the signature and the status.
Parsing a response like that will by design throw an exception containing
the status code error from the message. That, however, is not a legal SAML
status.
> I have seen in the documentation of the parse method in the
> class ParsePool, and it says that the SAMLException is thrown
> if there is no parser available. I find this very strange
> because I think the SAML message gets parsed since I know its
> error status.
That's not what it's doing.
> Does anyone have an idea of what's going on? Is this behaviour right?
Your trace suggests the code is crashing or something inside the method to
locate the exception "type". I really don't know what it's doing, but it's
trying to do what it usually does when there's an error status in the
message.
-- Scott
- Question SAML Exception, miro.casanova, 11/13/2006
- RE: Question SAML Exception, Scott Cantor, 11/13/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.