Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - Re: understanding the fromDOM method

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Re: understanding the fromDOM method


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Tom Scavo" <>
  • To: "Scott Cantor" <>
  • Cc: OpenSAML <>
  • Subject: Re: understanding the fromDOM method
  • Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 09:49:58 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=srlaDLPG5WFXZ8yFZMOlBk/oH4qB3XkrYUPhPk4OWixSipbtXp5MXKQAdnLkBGY3lRcTkRXCrix74LhoSsdYAuxNbL4cHPJFXb0E8B/EUD4CwuTf+WCnd31JEXR+i7rBh1xRHkmJQkzr9RYQzCCA9/crTjLpSUI3rz4U00Ou/70=
On 10/24/06, Scott Cantor
<>
wrote:
> Actually, I think all three should just check
>
> if ( !XML.isElementNamed(e,XML.SAML_NS,"SubjectStatement")

That's a more serious bug, actually, just realized. Needs to be an &&
instead of an || between the two options, I'll fix. I think I may have fixed
this in the old C++, but I'll check.

Ah, thank you! I've been racking my brain for two days trying to
figure that out. To make matters worse, I have not been able to
construct a unit test that causes it to fail (although it seems it
should). As it stands, a SubjectStatement with xsi:type should fail,
should it not?

Thanks,
Tom

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page