mace-opensaml-users - Re: OpenSAML integration
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Tom Scavo" <>
- To: "Yannick Thebault" <>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: OpenSAML integration
- Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 11:42:33 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Od3SZ0qgNzyn+f4Wh39FrRPCuonVim4EDLjWy20lle+tvvXPMC32iH3zYA6tXMCodMhuskDQrnAp/Km10mRzANG+TZPxlbJxSKuB5cYv+AXIQ6py+kXb6NCcH3lv3a5lKXNFSdwNkWUdrt93+Kvha+wZyL0XkWEyTMmd/ZGp1L0=
On 10/2/06, Yannick Thebault
<>
wrote:
I would like to know if OpenSAML can help me or if I need to develop
everything.
Consider Shibboleth 1.3, which is an open-source implementation of the
SAML V1.1 browser profiles.
There is no open-source implementation of SAML V2.0 available at this
time. There is a technology preview of OpenSAML 2.0, which is an early
implementation of SAML V2.0 Core (no binding support at this time).
Shibboleth 2.0 will implement the SAML V2.0 browser profiles. See the
wiki for details:
https://authdev.it.ohio-state.edu/twiki/bin/view/Shibboleth/OpenSAML
https://authdev.it.ohio-state.edu/twiki/bin/view/Shibboleth/FuturePlanning
Tom
- OpenSAML integration, Yannick Thebault, 10/02/2006
- Re: OpenSAML integration, Tom Scavo, 10/02/2006
- RE: OpenSAML integration, Scott Cantor, 10/02/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.