mace-opensaml-users - Re: Version number correlation
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Chad La Joie <>
- To: "Alpino, Justin" <>
- Cc: "''" <>
- Subject: Re: Version number correlation
- Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:32:18 -0400
The major versions do. So, OpenSAML 1.X supports SAML 1.X and OpenSAML 2.X support SAML 2.X (and 1.1X, it's cumulative).
Alpino, Justin wrote:
Hello,
Pardon me if the answer is obvious, but is the version numbers of the
openSAML toolkits directly related to the version numbers of the SAML spec?
Thanks,
Justin Alpino
Web Applications Developer
410-771-2654 (voice)
PHH Arval, a PHH Corporation Company (www.phharval.com)
Powerful ideas. Amazing results.
"The sender believes that this E-mail and any attachments were free of any
harmful and malicious code or defects when sent. This message and its
attachments could have been infected during transmission. By reading the
message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full
responsibility for taking protective and remedial action regarding the code
or such defects. The sender is not liable for any loss or damage arising in
any way from this message or its attachments."
--
Chad La Joie 2052-C Harris Bldg
OIS-Middleware 202.687.0124
- Version number correlation, Alpino, Justin, 07/27/2006
- RE: Version number correlation, Scott Cantor, 07/27/2006
- Re: Version number correlation, Chad La Joie, 07/27/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Version number correlation, Alpino, Justin, 07/27/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.