mace-opensaml-users - Re: Problem with C++ SAML
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Tom Scavo <>
- To: Manuel Sánchez Cuenca <>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: Problem with C++ SAML
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 09:08:08 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=L16O9CtrdOUAHq/6hYQNwPVR+jMwtwz4+3hug6Hp3P9WIutpugb1OMXsGBTFJ+bH6UyeUrmtvNFqLqEC34PkBQZcN3iDmALVKn/XNfFKtoyrofxvRxHvauX0rW9ks25C0IOVQ4GnfA1p83T1Vj3LNkc4vNJiWpx5YRl9AgEC6Ho=
On 2/1/06, Manuel Sánchez Cuenca
<>
wrote:
>
> ======================================================
> <Status xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.0:protocol"
> xmlns:samlp="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.0:protocol"><StatusCode
> Value="samlp:Responder"/><StatusMessage>XML::Parser detected an error
> during parsing: Element 'Action' is not valid for content model:
> '(Subject,,Action,Evidence)'</StatusMessage><StatusDetail
> xmlns:opensaml="http://www.opensaml.org";><opensaml:ExceptionClass>org.opensaml.MalformedException</opensaml:ExceptionClass></StatusDetail></Status>
> ======================================================
>
> Does anybody know why the C++ SAML parser can parse this statement?
Well, AuthorizationDecisionStatementType is based on
SubjectStatementAbstractType, which requires a Subject element.
Unless I'm missing something, your example doesn't have a Subject
element.
Tom
- Problem with C++ SAML, Manuel Sánchez Cuenca, 02/01/2006
- Re: Problem with C++ SAML, Tom Scavo, 02/01/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.